//I think that the UK is not ready for a PM whose skin is not quite the right shade of pale.//
I think this OP, like some of your other posts, is deliberately inflammatory, but since you have posted it I will respond to Khandro's assertion which appears to be that culture rather than colour is an issue, and therefore a person whose predecessors are not indigenous to this country and who adheres to a religion other than Christianity is unfit to fulfil the role of Prime Minister.
I can understand where Khandro is coming from to a degree - cultures can clash - but I think he has his wires severely crossed with this one. For example if an Islamist (of any colour, nationality or background) were appointed to the role, by the very nature of Islam his priority would be to adhere to the tenets of his religion simply because that is what Islam demands. That, however, doesn't apply to Hinduism or to any other religion that I can think of. Unlike other religions, rather than being part of life, Islam dictates every aspect of life and that, I think, would influence the way in which the Prime Minister regarded his allegiance, his responsibilities, and his performance. Hinduism would have no such effect.
I repeat the (unanswered) question I asked Khandro on the other thread where he expressed the same view. Would he object to a Jew, who also embraces a religion and a culture emanating from foreign shores, being installed as PM?