Donate SIGN UP

Prince Andrew A ***?

Avatar Image
spathiphyllum | 16:54 Tue 22nd Oct 2019 | News
89 Answers
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-orgy-virginia-roberts-giuffre-channel-4-dispatches-a9164566.html

Seems that way.

I feel the royal family should not be defending Andrew, and instead putting the spotlight on him, else it gives the impression the royals condone the behaviour.

If this was anyone else they would face retribution and trial.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 89rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by spathiphyllum. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
do you know what a *** is !! ?
Question Author
A peado.
I personally think so, but then again I've never liked him. Always thought of him as a self-entitled, arrogant prig. I also think he will get away with all this.
I haven't heard that very unpleasant term for a long time.
Originally a homosexual I think rather than a paedophile.
Having sex with a 17-year old girl hardly makes him a ***, spath.
HAve a word with yourself....
Question Author
"The other girls all seemed and appeared to be under the age of 18 and didn’t really speak English.”"

I think that fits the term used. However it seems that has been censored and i don't want my thread removed, so i don't think the term i used should be the focus of the thread.
I didn't realise *** meant paedo. I don't think he's that, but I do think he slept with a lot of much younger girls at Epstein's home. If he was anybody else, the truth would come out, but I feel the RF will close ranks.
Chinese whispers, spath.
The *only* female who has claimed to have sex with PA was 17 at the time.....

Question Author
Yes, the independant love reporting on... Chinese wipers :D There is much more to the story in the article
Hereiam - the ☆☆☆ didn't refer to the word you suggested. But an even more unpleasant word .
Chinese Wipers?

I prefer to base my opinions on substantiated facts rather than the spin generated by partisan journolists.
Having sex with a 17 year old doesn’t make a man a paedophile.
Of course it doesn't Naomi. There would be a great deal of paedophiles living in this country if it did. Andrew chose bad company. Stupid of him, but not a heinous crime. Just a typical rich bloke who was going through a middle aged crisis and needed an ego boost.
but it does make him untrustworthy, how old was he, was he still married, i don't suppose will ever know the truth of the matter. The Queen must be up in arms, as to Prince Philip, enough said.
Rosie, I believe is correct. My friend and her husband lived on Grand Cayman for 20 years and PA visited there with the Royal Navy during Pirates' Week which is a HUGE event there. Lots of private parties, lots of alcohol and drugs. I am told that boys were PA's entertainment of choice rather than young girls. Who knows? AC/DC I'd guess.
^I`ve heard the same many times re his leanings as well.
Loads like him around. But in his position he should have applied his brain, and unfortunately his brain was in his trousers. He was always called RandyAndy A real embarrassment to his family. Fergie was just as bad.
A very interesting documentary on tv last night ( Monday). Make your own minds up .
Through the ages there have been men and women who were not fit to be "royals" but were simply placed in that position by virtue of their birth. At any time in the future such an unfit person could be our king or queen.

The monarchy should be abolished. At least with a president they would have a limited time in office & could be challenged over misdemeanors.
I watched it Anne. Very interesting and I also made my mind up about Virginia Roberts!

1 to 20 of 89rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Prince Andrew A ***?

Answer Question >>