Crosswords0 min ago
'Converts' To Christianity
Do we need them?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Anyone who equates the Irish troubles in any way with Islamic terrorism is ignorant in the extreme - and it shows.
Why is it that every time the worst of Islam strikes - whether it be with bombs or grooming gangs - we hear these whines of denial and the same old comparisons to that which doesn’t - and cannot -compare? Islamists do not think like you …their culture isn’t your culture … they don’t want you want ….they despise you …. and every time you defend them they laugh at you because in rendering yourselves ‘useful idiots’ you are doing them the biggest favour. Take a reality check. Learn about Islam.
Why is it that every time the worst of Islam strikes - whether it be with bombs or grooming gangs - we hear these whines of denial and the same old comparisons to that which doesn’t - and cannot -compare? Islamists do not think like you …their culture isn’t your culture … they don’t want you want ….they despise you …. and every time you defend them they laugh at you because in rendering yourselves ‘useful idiots’ you are doing them the biggest favour. Take a reality check. Learn about Islam.
// The cowards were always miles away when their devices exploded//
noop - bomb houses were regularly exploding in the seventies - I mean honestly I know this is AB (*) but why do people make these statements? - MI5 had a hand in this. Bombs were radio controlled without a lock and 'squashes' were broadcast ( all frequency baaaaarp!) and the odd house would blow up.
To find out or er gather how many were inside at the time of detonation you counted prostates ( men ) or uteruses ( leddies) - bit gruesome. I am not sure why you would need this detail of morbid anatomy
In the end they had radio controlled detonators with digital locks which you cd activate and then detonate
Bham bombs seventies - done because four men blew themselves up trying to blow up the coventry phone exchange
https:/
Bishop of Brum forbade any priest from burying him as he died with mairder in his heart ....
chrissakes
(*) full of foo but short on facts as usual
noop - bomb houses were regularly exploding in the seventies - I mean honestly I know this is AB (*) but why do people make these statements? - MI5 had a hand in this. Bombs were radio controlled without a lock and 'squashes' were broadcast ( all frequency baaaaarp!) and the odd house would blow up.
To find out or er gather how many were inside at the time of detonation you counted prostates ( men ) or uteruses ( leddies) - bit gruesome. I am not sure why you would need this detail of morbid anatomy
In the end they had radio controlled detonators with digital locks which you cd activate and then detonate
Bham bombs seventies - done because four men blew themselves up trying to blow up the coventry phone exchange
https:/
Bishop of Brum forbade any priest from burying him as he died with mairder in his heart ....
chrissakes
(*) full of foo but short on facts as usual
I find it strange that a bomb planted in a shopping centre by the IRA is somehow more acceptable or understandable than an Islamic suicide bomber. Anybody who wants to take the life of innocent people for their cause - whether political or religious - are complete and utter scum.
Personally, the main gripe I have isn't with the condemnation of bombers, as their actions are utterly reprehensible, but the way some people seem almost gleeful to get the opportunity to attack ALL Muslims for the actions of the minority. Time and time again, after horrific events, it becomes open season on anyone even remotely similar to the culprits.
Of course these actions are horrific, but I refuse to condemn anyone other than the direct culprits, and I certainly try to avoid jumping to conclusions before details of events come to light.
Personally, the main gripe I have isn't with the condemnation of bombers, as their actions are utterly reprehensible, but the way some people seem almost gleeful to get the opportunity to attack ALL Muslims for the actions of the minority. Time and time again, after horrific events, it becomes open season on anyone even remotely similar to the culprits.
Of course these actions are horrific, but I refuse to condemn anyone other than the direct culprits, and I certainly try to avoid jumping to conclusions before details of events come to light.
Mozz, //I find it strange that a bomb planted in a shopping centre by the IRA is somehow more acceptable or understandable than an Islamic suicide bomber.//
I find that idea strange too. I can't imagine where you got it from - unless you're jumping to conclusions..
1ozzy, //Don't forget the Irish weren't terrorists, apparently only Muslims are.
Glad my education came from more than AB.//
Another weird idea and, again, totally unsubstantiated. Had your education come from AB it's likely that you wouldn't be so prone to flights of fancy.
I find that idea strange too. I can't imagine where you got it from - unless you're jumping to conclusions..
1ozzy, //Don't forget the Irish weren't terrorists, apparently only Muslims are.
Glad my education came from more than AB.//
Another weird idea and, again, totally unsubstantiated. Had your education come from AB it's likely that you wouldn't be so prone to flights of fancy.
"Personally, the main gripe I have isn't with the condemnation of bombers, as their actions are utterly reprehensible, but the way some people seem almost gleeful to get the opportunity to attack ALL Muslims for the actions of the minority. Time and time again, after horrific events, it becomes open season on anyone even remotely similar to the culprits. "
very well said Mozz... I don't think anyone denies that there is a problem with radical muslim terrorism but the argument always gets dragged back to having a go at islam as a whole.
very well said Mozz... I don't think anyone denies that there is a problem with radical muslim terrorism but the argument always gets dragged back to having a go at islam as a whole.
Untitled, you congratulate Mozz for saying //some people seem almost gleeful to get the opportunity to attack ALL Muslims for the actions of the minority//
… but as far as I can see no one here has done that - and I've certainly seen no 'glee'.
//the argument always gets dragged back to having a go at islam as a whole.//
Although the majority of Muslims do not commit acts of terrorism, Islam provides the encouragement for those who do.
… but as far as I can see no one here has done that - and I've certainly seen no 'glee'.
//the argument always gets dragged back to having a go at islam as a whole.//
Although the majority of Muslims do not commit acts of terrorism, Islam provides the encouragement for those who do.
