Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 68rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by MargoTester. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
///Can’t some of you clowns ///

I think you're getting a bit confused - it was the clown leaving the circus which kicked all this off.
-- answer removed --
Canary,
You missed out anti- monarchist.
-- answer removed --
Sunak was not not chosen because of his ethnicity, more because he has presided over years of economic mismanagement as Chancellor, and then had the gall to say that if he was elected PM, he would 'fix everything'.

It's not because of his skin colour, it's because he is delusional.
I think it's cos he was seen as a bigger rat than Truss for deserting Boris.
TTT and YMB - referring to someone using the term 'colour' is not racist, and does not contravene Site Rules.

Referring to an AB'er by name as a racist does contravene Site Rules, as does quoting that post, or referring to deleted posts.

Hope this helps.
I think TTT had a hand in writing the speeches when it was announced that the Conservative party is the greatest political party in the world (clearly one of the most modest too).
So much for collective responsibility in Cabinet - they were both in the same Cabinet. Johnson's.
AH: "Referring to an AB'er by name as a racist does contravene Site Rules, as does quoting that post, or referring to deleted posts. " - but surely accusing the party of racism when the party has not even mention the race of either candidate is wrong so why have the posts pointing that out been removed rather than the posts doing it?
AH, fair enough but why doe the post effectively calling all Tories (and we know who they bare getting at) racists still persist.

It's this sort of moderation that gets peoples backs up and will be the end of AB in the end (not just because of this its been happening to many others. Poor Gromit for instance~)
"fair enough but why doe the post effectively calling all Tories (and we know who they bare getting at) racists still persist."

Which post does that refer to?
I am not willing to derail this thread by getting into a Moderation argument.

The Moderator concerned has deleted posts as per his or her judgement, I saw them, and I can agree with their judgement and action.

If you have any issues, report them to the Editor, but I suggest not continuing this off-thread line of discussion, because it in turn contravenes Site Rules, and in the interest of keeping the thread on track, such posts may well be removed.
13:01.

Blatant
Cancelled then AH.

No surprise. Perhaps you would prefer me to leave?
Yep, with zero evidence, the Tory party can be accused of racism using the sort of snide language we are used to from TROB but any objection and the pointing out of where the real racism lies is some how a contravention. No wonder the site needs a donation button.
some of these posts wouid fit in well in Putin's Russia
( you have to keep your mouth shut, geddit??)

anyway I am glad that awful armenian immigrant ( Barees of course) has gone....
//No wonder the site needs a donation button.//

Or a DETONATION button! LOL
"Ah well Sunak wrong colour" given the fact that mote than 60,000 folk voted for him, that clearly does not amount to saying all Tories are racist.

If you interpret it in that way, that is only your opinion and not supported by the facts
YMB - // Cancelled then AH.

No surprise. Perhaps you would prefer me to leave? //

Not especially.

I am supporting the Moderation I agree with, and I repeat, I not going to assist you in derailing this thread.

If you have issues with the Moderator concerned, or myself, or both, speak to the Editor.

41 to 60 of 68rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

New Pm

Answer Question >>