Could The Nefarious Hand Of Antifa Be...
News2 mins ago
Is This Fair?
Or even sensible?
https:/
Clothes are non essential for 17 days while presumably chilli sauce, for example, isn’t ...
https:/
Clothes are non essential for 17 days while presumably chilli sauce, for example, isn’t ...
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ichkeria. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think its dumb. People will just shop online and when those who have not done it before find how easy it is, then that money will never come back locally. The employees in chain stores are also local and we all know that if the income per square metre falls below a certain level, then the store will close and that will be that.
I have seen the article in the link and one of the items that has been deemed to be non essential are microwave ovens. Try telling an elderly or disabled person who relies on them for their daily hot meal that they can't have another one until the small shops can open again because its an non essential! What an idiot!
I have seen the article in the link and one of the items that has been deemed to be non essential are microwave ovens. Try telling an elderly or disabled person who relies on them for their daily hot meal that they can't have another one until the small shops can open again because its an non essential! What an idiot!
Of course it is neither fair nor sensible. This is just the time when people are looking at Winter clothing. My waterproofs are ancient and need renewing. I don't buy them from supermarkets, but I do buy things like ankle-socks, everyday knickers etc., etc.. Sometimes I buy a jumper - or Summer equivalent.
If you need a new Winter coat for a child who has grown since last year - you go to the supermarket. Baby clothes are another area. This hits poorer people again - and if you are in the supermarket doing your shop.... why shouldn't you nip down the clothing aisles? It does no harm to anyone.
If you need a new Winter coat for a child who has grown since last year - you go to the supermarket. Baby clothes are another area. This hits poorer people again - and if you are in the supermarket doing your shop.... why shouldn't you nip down the clothing aisles? It does no harm to anyone.
"How do you think Ed Stafford,Bear Grylles and Ray Meirs cope without Morrisons,Tescos,Waitrose,and Sainsbury in the Mongolian steppes?"
They send one of the crew to get what they need.
Amazing how these intrepid types are second to arrive at the exciting or dangerous bits, just after the film crew.
I'm off to drink my own urine now, just like Bear.
Yes, I'm taking the ...
They send one of the crew to get what they need.
Amazing how these intrepid types are second to arrive at the exciting or dangerous bits, just after the film crew.
I'm off to drink my own urine now, just like Bear.
Yes, I'm taking the ...
No.... it seems the idea is to put extra businesses at a disadvantage. People won't wait because a certain shop is shut, they will just go online... and might well get used to it. Allowing the smaller shops to stay open would be better. This clearly doesn't suit them, or customers, or supermarkets....but I'm sure Amazon will be delighted :-)
It's neither fair or sensible and it's nonsensical to suggest it is - it is completely ill-thought out, doesn't stand up to even the merest of common-sense scrutiny, and merely confirms that we seem to have totally lost the plot.
It is utterly bizarre to suggest somebody can't buy a microwave in Tesco if it conks out, which if it is their only means of cooking is completely essential, but they can buy microwave meals which they then can't cook.
The people in charge are repeatedly, and with boring regularity, coming up with rules that make absolutely zero sense.
It is utterly bizarre to suggest somebody can't buy a microwave in Tesco if it conks out, which if it is their only means of cooking is completely essential, but they can buy microwave meals which they then can't cook.
The people in charge are repeatedly, and with boring regularity, coming up with rules that make absolutely zero sense.
//We all have enough clothes for the next month or so…//
How do you know? I need some new socks (more urgently than I need a tin of beans).
//but food stuffs are more necessary//
What, all foodstuffs? Doughnuts? Bread rolls? Fruit cake? Cherry Bakewells?
Of all the rubbish that has spewed forth from the four governments in the past few months, this ranks among the most crass. It is a nonsensical rule, introduced by a nonsensical First Minister of a totally superfluous and nonsensical government.
How do you know? I need some new socks (more urgently than I need a tin of beans).
//but food stuffs are more necessary//
What, all foodstuffs? Doughnuts? Bread rolls? Fruit cake? Cherry Bakewells?
Of all the rubbish that has spewed forth from the four governments in the past few months, this ranks among the most crass. It is a nonsensical rule, introduced by a nonsensical First Minister of a totally superfluous and nonsensical government.
Reading through this it's no wonder the UK is in such a mess. It's fair to close parts of big supermarkets unless all small shops are allowed to stay open - otherwise small traders who obey the law are badly disadvantaged.
It's sensible because the best way to shop in a supermarket is quickly and efficiently - without dawdling, browsing and handling goods that you just want to look through without buying.
Jourdain. You refuse to wear a mask yet you want to nip down the clothing aisles for knickers and socks, maybe a jumper. You want to wander around unmasked handling goods? That is far from sensible for your sake let alone anyone else.
It's sensible because the best way to shop in a supermarket is quickly and efficiently - without dawdling, browsing and handling goods that you just want to look through without buying.
Jourdain. You refuse to wear a mask yet you want to nip down the clothing aisles for knickers and socks, maybe a jumper. You want to wander around unmasked handling goods? That is far from sensible for your sake let alone anyone else.
