Should I Tell This Guy No Point Speaking...
Family & Relationships2 mins ago
Can We Just Stop With This Nonsense.
the attacker as in his 30s or 40s, with short, dark, curly hair, a tanned complexion and a short beard.
https:/
a tanned complexion For Funks Sake
https:/
a tanned complexion For Funks Sake
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by -Talbot-. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So much easier back in the 70’s and 80’s before all the PC male bovine excrement era.
We had a friend in our group who was the original throwback.
His nickname was Trop.
He had no problem with it.
He was given the monicker because he had the appearance of one who hailed from ‘tropical waters’.
Ironically he became a social worker!
The police need to be a bit more imaginative and ought to make use of a thesaurus at the very least.
We had a friend in our group who was the original throwback.
His nickname was Trop.
He had no problem with it.
He was given the monicker because he had the appearance of one who hailed from ‘tropical waters’.
Ironically he became a social worker!
The police need to be a bit more imaginative and ought to make use of a thesaurus at the very least.
yeah in the seventies we had a fella in the group
called 'Sp+++ie"
it rhymed with lermie
honestly I dont want to go into it further
but thanks for the memory
hey you are medical - ther was one black eyed beauty who looked like a throw back born to sort of aryan parents. And at sort of age 25 it turned out she had thalassemia.
No throw back at all - a desert luffer was involved during service in Egypt when the English were running away from the Germans.
called 'Sp+++ie"
it rhymed with lermie
honestly I dont want to go into it further
but thanks for the memory
hey you are medical - ther was one black eyed beauty who looked like a throw back born to sort of aryan parents. And at sort of age 25 it turned out she had thalassemia.
No throw back at all - a desert luffer was involved during service in Egypt when the English were running away from the Germans.
What is claimed we have is a situation where:
* the police are ignoring their responsibilities - making their job harder to do, less likely to result in prosecution and justice less likely to be done - by deliberately using language that is designed to obfuscate
* police let certain racial or religious groups get away with certain quite nasty crimes, like rape, for the purposes of social cohesion
* this specific case, claiming somebody had a tanned skin, was yet another example of this happening
My questions would be:
1) how does it help social cohesion to allow one group to get away with offences targeted at a second group?
2) same question, when both groups know for a fact this is taking place - how is that supposed to help social cohesion?
3) in this specific case, an arrest has been made despite the use of the word "tanned" - so in what sense are the police avoiding their duty to bring perpetrators to justice and does this arrest harm or help social cohesion?
The logic doesn't stack up.
It's claimed to help social cohesion but it would clearly do the exact opposite of that, especially if and when it became common knowledge, as it apparently already has.
It's claimed that the police used "tanned" to make their job harder, but they've still managed to make an arrest and the arrested is still a member of one of the groups that is apparently being let off.
What it's actually all about is the creation, dissemination and perpetuation of distrust in our police.
* the police are ignoring their responsibilities - making their job harder to do, less likely to result in prosecution and justice less likely to be done - by deliberately using language that is designed to obfuscate
* police let certain racial or religious groups get away with certain quite nasty crimes, like rape, for the purposes of social cohesion
* this specific case, claiming somebody had a tanned skin, was yet another example of this happening
My questions would be:
1) how does it help social cohesion to allow one group to get away with offences targeted at a second group?
2) same question, when both groups know for a fact this is taking place - how is that supposed to help social cohesion?
3) in this specific case, an arrest has been made despite the use of the word "tanned" - so in what sense are the police avoiding their duty to bring perpetrators to justice and does this arrest harm or help social cohesion?
The logic doesn't stack up.
It's claimed to help social cohesion but it would clearly do the exact opposite of that, especially if and when it became common knowledge, as it apparently already has.
It's claimed that the police used "tanned" to make their job harder, but they've still managed to make an arrest and the arrested is still a member of one of the groups that is apparently being let off.
What it's actually all about is the creation, dissemination and perpetuation of distrust in our police.
imaginative is not what the police need to be. Factual is, surely?
—————
It surely is, so if you want them to be factual why couldn’t they put ‘of Arabic/Pakistani/Indian extraction’?
I’m sure you know the reasons why in 21st century paralysed-by-PC paranoia Britain.
Obviously the recent scandals where they were stifled and discouraged from making enquires and building cases through fear of upsetting local ethnic communities has escaped you......
—————
It surely is, so if you want them to be factual why couldn’t they put ‘of Arabic/Pakistani/Indian extraction’?
I’m sure you know the reasons why in 21st century paralysed-by-PC paranoia Britain.
Obviously the recent scandals where they were stifled and discouraged from making enquires and building cases through fear of upsetting local ethnic communities has escaped you......
Wonder who decided it was not in the public interest or no longer legal to display photos of escapees from prisons who are described as highly dangerous and not to be approached.
“His name is Crusher Bones.We are not allowed to show his mugshot for legal reasons so don’t approach if you see him”
Sheesh
“His name is Crusher Bones.We are not allowed to show his mugshot for legal reasons so don’t approach if you see him”
Sheesh
the notion you're putting forth that the police are trying to cause social cohesion due to them not painting the picture the way you wish they did has nothing to do with the police, it has more to do with you and your perception.
You've invented a conspiracy theory because the police aren't being prejudiced. That's mental.
You've invented a conspiracy theory because the police aren't being prejudiced. That's mental.
Latest Posts
Spectator N0 2653 By Cheesecracker
Crosswords28 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles73 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles75 mins ago
