Politics1 min ago
Is Literacy A Left Wing Problem?
31 Answers
None of them know what a lie is. None of them seem to be able to read a statement and a suggestion on the side of a bus. What else do they struggle with?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Here is an example, the poster's words even disprove his own assertion. A sad affliction that only seems to infect the left:
https:/ /www.th eanswer bank.co .uk/New s/Quest ion1837 453.htm l
https:/
Even to the extent that it might be a mistake on Gromit's part to call it a "lie", it would hardly count as an example of illiteracy.
But the real problem is that it's switching the blame to the wrong people. There is every sign that the pledge will fall well short of that intended goal. See eg https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ society /2023/f eb/04/o nly-10- of-bori s-johns on-prom ised-40 -new-ho spitals -have-f ull-pla nning-p ermissi on
Even if it's not a lie, it's an empty promise that is bound to fail. I don't mind politicians setting ambitious targets, but I *do* mind it when they find cunning and deceitful ways to argue that they didn't fail.
It's the same with the bus. The £350 million figure was plain wrong anyway (see eg the multiple ONS statements debunking it), so that's already misleading on its own. Saying "Let's spend it on the NHS instead" may not be a literal promise/contract, but it deliberately misses the force behind a "Let's" statement, which is a clear and unambiguous statement of intent. If that statement is then not followed-up, it's reasonable to feel aggrieved -- both those who agreed on the understanding that this would happen, and those who were frustrated that this sort of empty promise ended up working.
But the real problem is that it's switching the blame to the wrong people. There is every sign that the pledge will fall well short of that intended goal. See eg https:/
Even if it's not a lie, it's an empty promise that is bound to fail. I don't mind politicians setting ambitious targets, but I *do* mind it when they find cunning and deceitful ways to argue that they didn't fail.
It's the same with the bus. The £350 million figure was plain wrong anyway (see eg the multiple ONS statements debunking it), so that's already misleading on its own. Saying "Let's spend it on the NHS instead" may not be a literal promise/contract, but it deliberately misses the force behind a "Let's" statement, which is a clear and unambiguous statement of intent. If that statement is then not followed-up, it's reasonable to feel aggrieved -- both those who agreed on the understanding that this would happen, and those who were frustrated that this sort of empty promise ended up working.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.