Donate SIGN UP

You The British Tax Payer Spends £46.9Million On Projects In China.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 12:54 Thu 26th Apr 2018 | News
61 Answers
But that's not all:

£14.3million is spent to help fund the fishing industry in Nigeria.

Malawi received £360,000 for fish farming schemes while £611,000 was given to the international charity WorldFish, which works to improve fisheries and aquaculture to reduce hunger and poverty.

A further £263,000 was given to Nepal to develop fish farming and £616,000 to Zimbabwe to fund schemes for fish farmers.

In all, Britain sends £13.4billion of aid overseas each year, are you happy with this?

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/951540/foreign-aid-china-uk-pauline-latham-sam-gyimah

Answers

41 to 60 of 61rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
when? show me?
When what?
TCL : "TTT the Ab Editor spoke to you just the other day about your using rhyming slang and now you're using offensive rhyming slang. " - show me, I don't remember and what's offensive?
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
When I have a minute, I'll have a look. The slang you used was rhyming slang for an offensive word for Chinese and don't come the innocent.
you're aving a giraffe TTT ;-)
-- answer removed --
Thsnks ALBA,

"And if you avoid rhyming slang, your thread will be about the actual subject and not about how confusing/annoying the way you asked the question is - wouldn't that be preferable?"
fair enough, missed that.
Regardless of missing the Ed's comments, you thought it okay still to be offensive.
I have not been offensive, that's in your head.
I must be the odd one out as I find TTT's inventive use of rhyming slang quite amusing and enjoy deciphering them. The one on this thread was OTT but clearly people had no trouble in getting it.
As the post's been deleted, it appears it's not only me who thought it offensive.
Some get offended over nothing.

Is AB now discriminating against real Londoners if rhyming slang is not allowed. Isn't that racist?

And no I dont agree with the amount sent out on aid. I have nothing against aid but it should not be a % and it should not go to large nations. If we want to support for business then have a fund that does just that.
youngmafbog

Firstly - what do you mean by ‘real Londoners’?

Londoners don’t use rhyming slang - Cockneys do. And the definition of a Cockney is someone who is born within the sound of Bow Bells. There is no determination to the race of the person, so it cannot be racist.
Londoners don’t use rhyming slang - Cockneys do.


You started out ok there but lost it towards the end of the sentence, sp.

Londoners don’t use rhyming slang - C ...s do
My all-time favourite:



Once more we have to ask ourselves - what was the thread about again?

41 to 60 of 61rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.