Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
Film, Media & TV3 mins ago
Pay Peanuts.........
46 Answers
https:/
Looks like yet another banking up ckoc. Doesn't surprise me TBH, I see it every day, "management" know best, trying to cut costs. I don't know the tech cause yet but pound to pinch of tish it'll be some outsourced function without a scooby do, who are "cheap". Penny wise, pound foolish etc!
Looks like yet another banking up ckoc. Doesn't surprise me TBH, I see it every day, "management" know best, trying to cut costs. I don't know the tech cause yet but pound to pinch of tish it'll be some outsourced function without a scooby do, who are "cheap". Penny wise, pound foolish etc!
Answers
Seems pretty clear what TTT is on about. Baks have been cutting corners by sacking Western workers, particularly in IT, and outsourcing to other countries. Often thes companies hire third rate personal or a load of grads. I know this because I was heavily involved with a couple of them doing this. One I was the contract manager for outsourcing. When I...
08:33 Tue 24th Apr 2018
//if you want to read back swearing and mockney and the Editor is happy//
The editor isn't that happy - can't we just talk normally so everything isn't such a puzzle? TTT, if you want to swear, just asterisk it out, or even better, find a way to say what you mean more politely. And if you avoid rhyming slang, your thread will be about the actual subject and not about how confusing/annoying the way you asked the question is - wouldn't that be preferable?
The editor isn't that happy - can't we just talk normally so everything isn't such a puzzle? TTT, if you want to swear, just asterisk it out, or even better, find a way to say what you mean more politely. And if you avoid rhyming slang, your thread will be about the actual subject and not about how confusing/annoying the way you asked the question is - wouldn't that be preferable?
How come we are deemed unable to "understand" TTT, but are expected to decipher the non conformist warblings of "others"? I cannot be alone in making perfectly good sense of what is being said. Perhaps one poster is considered less favourably than others. Disgraceful attempts again by contributors attempting to make mischief for TTT. Confected outrage that is intended to serve a different agenda, rather than the real reason.
// The editor isn't that happy //
The editor should work on getting the Site Rules changed to include a clause forbidding the use of so called mockney then. If such a rule existed, the miscreants could be legitimately tackled.
It'd be a strange thing to do though, especially as most other users don't have a problem with it (personally I find it very funny), and he/she should be encouraging greater use of the site rather than restricting it to only those people who are prepared to talk 'normally'.
The editor should work on getting the Site Rules changed to include a clause forbidding the use of so called mockney then. If such a rule existed, the miscreants could be legitimately tackled.
It'd be a strange thing to do though, especially as most other users don't have a problem with it (personally I find it very funny), and he/she should be encouraging greater use of the site rather than restricting it to only those people who are prepared to talk 'normally'.
I'll make a liar of myself (about leaving the thread) to add this - Ummmm, you/we are wasting our time.
It's refreshing honest for some to admit they find it's funny and I accept they do , the last time I giggled at writing rude words backwards to fool Teacher (online censor in this case) I guess I'd be about twelve.
It's refreshing honest for some to admit they find it's funny and I accept they do , the last time I giggled at writing rude words backwards to fool Teacher (online censor in this case) I guess I'd be about twelve.
