Yes, I do, Ladybirder, but I find Jim more intelligent and his posts more interesting. I haven't learnt much from Andy other than his views on matters, whereas I have learnt quite a bit from both Naomi and Jim. (Others as well of course.)
//... I have learnt quite a bit from both Naomi and Jim//
If you're a normally curious person a good reason for using this and such sites: "I've learnt something new", or "That's a way of looking at an issue that I'd never considered before".
Am I the only one here trying to work out how two carefully selected ABers could be referred to as 'random'?
Anyway, I think we should put Henry1938 in charge of ensuring that all questions are easily comprehensible, with Peter Pedant doing the same for the answers.
ASBO would like to thank you for your kind invitation but must decline. He is currently VERY busy exploring his new home and yelling at his slave every 7 mins for some reason best known to him. His slave has promised him that he can go outside on Friday which he is very pleased about because Bird Tv is getting boring and he'd like to go play in the trees.
//If you're a normally curious person a good reason for using this and such sites: "I've learnt something new", or "That's a way of looking at an issue that I'd never considered before". //
Yes, and those who can make you think about something another way do come across as intelligent, whereas those who simply name call those who think differently come across as not very intelligent at all.