//And faith based on knowledge and revelation?//
Faith based on knowledge or knowledge based on faith, either way you're redefining knowledge and faith. Neither require or rely on the other. They are in fact mutually exclusive.
Here's what is at stake. You claim to have evidence to support your belief but evidence is not proof, especially when what lies in the balance is justice, human dignity and human life. It is easy to conjure up evidence that appears to support a cherished belief. But your seeming coincidences between alleged prophecies and vague circumstance are insufficient to condemn a single human being to the electric chair let alone the vast majority of everyone that has ever lived to eternal torment. You better be damned sure, not just believe your right while refusing to question the legitimacy and voracity of your own reasoning, before acting as virtual judge, jury and executioner over the human race.
Acting as assigned spokesperson for an alleged creator of the universe is a grave responsibility, one that no one should presume no matter how many or few have been able to persuade or convince each other of their supposed god given right to do so.
You claim to have the answers to all of the asserted 'big questions' and yet you obviously have not even determined what the important questions are let alone have the answer to. For heavens sake, if not for the sake of humanity, if you learn nothing else, learn to know and understand the limitations imposed by the human mind on the means and process of reason before determining you've tapped into some undefined incomprehensible source of revealed superior knowledge.
A little knowledge is often a dangerous thing, no less so when what one thinks is knowledge is nothing of the sort but is treated as and acted upon as though it was.