ChatterBank5 mins ago
Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by chrissa1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.From Zaghari-Ratcliffe‘s wikipedia page.
// Boris Johnson mistake
A central part of Zaghari-Ratcliffe's defence was that she was there on a holiday and never worked to train journalists in the country.
However, on 1 November 2017, the then-British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said "When we look at what Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was doing, she was simply teaching people journalism, as I understand it, at the very limit. These remarks appear to have put her at risk.
Her employer, Thomson Reuters Foundation, called on Johnson to "immediately correct the serious mistake he made" in this statement. They added "She is not a journalist and has never trained journalists at the Thomson Reuters Foundation". Four days later, Zaghari-Ratcliffe was returned to court in Iran where the Foreign Secretary's statement was cited as evidence against her. //
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Nazan in_Zagh ari-Rat cliffe
// Boris Johnson mistake
A central part of Zaghari-Ratcliffe's defence was that she was there on a holiday and never worked to train journalists in the country.
However, on 1 November 2017, the then-British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said "When we look at what Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was doing, she was simply teaching people journalism, as I understand it, at the very limit. These remarks appear to have put her at risk.
Her employer, Thomson Reuters Foundation, called on Johnson to "immediately correct the serious mistake he made" in this statement. They added "She is not a journalist and has never trained journalists at the Thomson Reuters Foundation". Four days later, Zaghari-Ratcliffe was returned to court in Iran where the Foreign Secretary's statement was cited as evidence against her. //
https:/
// The Shah of Iran ordered British tanks,//
let me add a little law ( 1000 ABers scream oh no!)
The revolutionary govt 1979 declared a revolutionary govt. So what - they repudiated and refused to pay Shah's debts. default. no moolah. no payee and no returnee goods. That one
and then said - oh the £400m - that is different, can we have it back please. and no you cant have the american embassy workers NOR can you have the embassy that was burnt down
picky huh
let me add a little law ( 1000 ABers scream oh no!)
The revolutionary govt 1979 declared a revolutionary govt. So what - they repudiated and refused to pay Shah's debts. default. no moolah. no payee and no returnee goods. That one
and then said - oh the £400m - that is different, can we have it back please. and no you cant have the american embassy workers NOR can you have the embassy that was burnt down
picky huh
PP,
The matter went to court.
// In 1990 Iran made a claim for its money back for the undelivered weaponry by taking the UK to international arbitration in The Hague. The UK made a counterclaim in 1996, but in an arbitration in 2001 the UK lost both claims. //
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ news/20 21/nov/ 11/naza nin-zag hari-ra tcliffe -iran-u k-debt- arms-de al
The matter went to court.
// In 1990 Iran made a claim for its money back for the undelivered weaponry by taking the UK to international arbitration in The Hague. The UK made a counterclaim in 1996, but in an arbitration in 2001 the UK lost both claims. //
https:/