Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Heavy handed? Not at all! The police were doing their duty, which is more than can be said of the woman in question.
I think the heavy handedness was aimed at Derbyshire police being a little over aggressive in their shutting down of picnics. They will still be doing it, but with a bit more of a (in a mockney 1950s spike Milligan type accent) ‘Yooouuuve been a norty boy’ type way rather than going in with the full Hendon instilled sarcasm.
Strange case.
While I agree, there where no police at all at a London train station when hundreds of people where getting off one train onto another, packed like sardines in a can. As per on good morning Britain this morning???
Idiosyncratic policing. Tube trains jam packed but, move along, nothing to see here.
Nobody said they had to be bright.
//"It seems here that someone who declined to give police their personal details has been classed as 'potentially infectious' and criminalised as a result.//

'potentially infectious' ....
Could someone be arrested for being a 'potential' burglar because they were out at night?
A 'potential' bank robber because they were (sensibly) wearing a mask while entering a bank?
A 'potential' pedo because he's a man taking a shortcut through a (deserted) kids play area?

Yes, heavy handed policing IMO.
Nailit, I imagine the police would ask a man why he was masked when entering a bank? And if he refused to give an answer, yes, he might well be in trouble; but you might expect that he would explain unless his reasons were illegal.

Which is what happened here. I don't like it but I think it's acceptable as a short term measure (it had better be dropped the minute the lockdown is at an end, though).
Isn't there an offence "going equipped"? Carrying knives is also an offence, just in case you use them aggressively.
//Nailit, I imagine the police would ask a man why he was masked when entering a bank?//
In normal circumstances jno, yes. But these arnt normal circumstances are they? A lot of people that Ive seen queuing for banks have been masked...awful lot of 'potential' bank robbers around.

//And if he refused to give an answer, yes, he might well be in trouble//
If he was in a queue, I doubt that he would be waiting to pull a sawn off shotgun.
Same with anyone going about their business. The police need a reasonable suspicion to arrest someone. Refusing to give your details is NOT a reasonable suspicion that you have a virus.
Might be a reason to suspect a disobedience of the law on not taking non-essential journeys though, in order to avoid spreading infection.

My concern is the lack of clear guidance on what is essential. We have but four examples, of which there must be many. But if interpretation is subjective one can be out legitimately yet be told by police that it's non-essential, and risk fines/a record for being a good citizen.
//My concern is the lack of clear guidance on what is essential//
Exactly!
That northern bloke who used to work for Channel 4 summed it up in a coupe of sentences on t'radio a few minutes ago.

The very, very British Sergeant Wilson approach to almost everything, towit, "I wonder if you'd mind awfully doing......." whether it be staying at home, making ventilators or well nigh anything else leaving stuff open to interpretation, often by bloody-minded folk who know their rights.

That's why it goes tits-up so often when the sheriff comes to town with his/her limited thought processes.
Whatever was 'essential' we'll never know, the woman passed up on the opportunity ...
It's confusing who is and isn't for people obeying the lock-down.

nailit?
I think the problem here is the government and the police are solely concerned with our physical welfare and are totally ignoring our equally important mental and spiritual welfare.
People are reading this story according to their own agenda:
They were called to deal with this women who was behaving oddly.
She was committing ticket fraud.
She refused to give her details or any explanation and therefore couldn't be dealt with by way of process or a ticket.
Police didn't fine her, the magistrates did.
Had she co-operated she may well have got away with nothing more than a warning or a much cheaper 'ticket'.
//It's confusing who is and isn't for people obeying the lock-down.

nailit?//

What? Is that a question or a statement roy?
//Police didn't fine her, the magistrates did//
Magistrates dont 'fine' people willy nilly.
The police must have charged her first and then the CPS have taken it to court.
Police,trying to keep people safe. We all want to stay safe and healthy. We all want the coronavirus to go away.Stay positive.

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Heavy Handed Police?

Answer Question >>