Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 80 of 383rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by THECORBYLOON. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The Country is now governed by unelected Judges.......Time for Judges to be elected then, not appointed .
-- answer removed --
maggie: "You can wriggle as much as you want TTT, but please stick to the facts." - I am the great in great Britain is not an adjective, wouls you like me to explain what and adjective is?
! Scotland has nothing to prove, we have always known we are superior. " - great then you wont mind leaving the UK with your half of the national debt then.
"The Country is now governed by unelected Judges......."

with proven eussr leanings and sympathies...
No it is clearly not. Government governs. Government must govern lawfully.
@ttt

"great then you wont mind leaving the UK with your half of the national debt then"

if only they would..chance would be a fine thing
I feel that perhaps I am missing something.

Did the Court point to any law that had been broken or did it merely come to a decision based on some misguided thought that Her Majesty colluded with with the Prime Minister.??

Hans.
Maggie, if Scotland is so superior how come they need English money to survive?
"No it is clearly not. Government governs. Government must govern lawfully."

well in that case in true remainiac fashion I "demand" that the case be re reheard with unbiased judges with no known or proven kinks to the eussr...
hans, we have so far struggled to determine what law has been broken.
The court wanted a good reason to prorogue parliament and weren't happy with what they knew. Looks to me that taking that view they can prevent any proroguing of parliament. And all the info about Brexit beforehand can't be relevant since if they can't reach a conclusion on what the queen was told how can they conclude Brexit was relevant. It looks like trying to excuse a decision they wanted to make.
LOONY 11.42 I am still PMSL at the courts decision I will be PMSL, all day, LOL.
nneasquith//NB. 11.38. This post is not TCL, it’s easy to confuse the usernames .//

Gee, thanks, annie, but I think we all know that. TLC is the one with a brain.
"Maggie, if Scotland is so superior how come they need English money to survive?"

thats why the want to be ruled by the eussr if they get cut loose from the UK...they know they are doomed without either UK or eussr money
As Johnson said only yesterday, he fully respects the impartiality of the Court.

Hans: see the judgement. As has been pointed out time and time again, "unlawful" means "contrary to the rule of law", and is not the same as illegal, ie "against a specific law". Still, if you want to be so crude, the "law that has been broken" is the common law doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty and Accountability.
Happy to Tora: anyone other than Johnson tho and I’d be biting your hand off
There is some extremely one sided reporting by the BBC.
-- answer removed --
It’s not a ruling on Brexit
It’s not a ruling on Brexit

Repeat to end ...
a a pedantic point, the Great in Great britain is an adjective isnt it - not meaning brilliant, but large (as in the greater island)

61 to 80 of 383rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Prorogation Ruled To Be Unlawful

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.