There needs to be at least some context for quoting that "democracy doesn't mean what you think it means". If I remember correctly, it was in the context of whether holding a further referendum on the Brexit issue could ever be seen as democratic. You argued that it was not, arguing that a second vote by nature destroys the legitimacy of the first one. I argued that it is, because democracy implies that the electorate cannot be permanently bound by its past.
I don't wish to revisit the argument in full, but up until that point it was a perfectly reasonable debate. But, as best as I can remember, neither side in the debate was pulling their punches (I can be pretty sure about this -- when have you ever minced words about what you personally think, N?), so as far as I'm concerned the worst that I can be accused of is giving as good as I got. I stand by my quote, in its proper context.
But, in any case, as you can see, you seem rather isolated in your judgement. Perhaps you're using the royal pronoun, because otherwise arguing that "we" don't take my posts seriously is, clearly, wildly optimistic. *You* might not, but stop pretending to speak for anybody more than yourself (and possibly Pixie).
And, now that you've made your opinion clear, multiple times, I am perfectly aware of it. Attacking someone's character, in lieu of any substantial points, gets old quickly. Find something new to say, and I'll be happy to continue to cross swords with you in future.