Meghan Markle

[thesshhh]

When is someone (ideally it should be her husband) finally going to stand up to this woman and say “No!”? https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1150909/Meghan-markle-news-latest-Wimbledon-duchess-of-sussex-duke-of-sussex-royal-baby-Archie Her monstrous ego and demands are totally out of control

[naomi24]

Whichever takes your fancy.

[andy-hughes]

Indeed - food for thought.

I have no idea if the DH story is any more plausible than the yards of guff that the tabloids trot out daily about the Duchess - and in the end, do we really care?

Well I don't, I suspect you don't, but theshhh clearly does.

[naomi24]

It seems rather odd that you bang on telling everyone else not to believe everything they read .... and then post something like that.

[thesshhh]

Lol. A journalist telling people not to believe what they read!

[andy-hughes]

the shhh - // Lol. A journalist telling people not to believe what they read! //

As I have pointed out, and am happy to do again - i work in music journalism, which, although it does have its own purple patches from time to time, it has nothing like the subversive agendas of the tabloids.

Speaking personally, I have never ever sent anything to print that I do not believe to the the absolute truth, either because I have verified it personally, or I am quoting the source verbatim from a personal conversation.

That puts me several ethical light years away from the 'media correspondent' who was so keen to go jangling to the Telegraph.

[HansUrbancka]

Are you saying andy, that everything you post in AB is guaranteed to be 100% truthful. If so, I applaud you and suggest that a vote of confidence should be placed in your goodself.

All in favour say 'aye'.

Hams.

[andy-hughes]

Hans - // Are you saying andy, that everything you post in AB is guaranteed to be 100% truthful. //

No, I am saying that everything I send to the magazines and websites I work for is 100% truthful - if I am stating it to be a fact, then I have verified it, if it is an opinion, then obviously that is not factual.

[pixie374]

There is a difference anyway, between saying something you completely believe or know to be the truth, and newspapers who make money from misleading and letting people leap to their own conclusions.
From what I saw of the wedding, either Meghan really is in love with Harry, or is a great actress (lol). I'm sure she will get the hang of it.

[HansUrbancka]

Hi andy h @21.30

Thanks for confirming my suspicion that you are Not always truthful in AB.

Accortdingly , I shall ignore your latest reponse in the following thread.

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Spam-and-Scams/Question1664229.html

Hans.

[Mamyalynne]

Andy oh Andy - you forgot to add a smiley wink.

[andy-hughes]

Hans - // Thanks for confirming my suspicion that you are Not always truthful in AB. //

You are leaping to a conclusion simply because you choose to do so.

My views on AB may involve facts which I believe to be true, but may not be so, and I cannot always be in a position to know either way.

Suffice it to say that I answer any OP or response as truthfully as I am able, I do not lie internationally, and I am sure that goes for the majority of AB'ers.

I may not always be truthful, but that is not the same as saying that I offer untruths deliberately, I do not.

As I often quote, the flat-earther speaks the truth as they believe it to be - but that does not mean that what they say is true.

[retrocop]

Spath


//Has there ever been a royal divorce?//

//(in recent history)//

I assume you are not actually old enough to have heard of the Countess and Lord Snowdon are you? Not recent enough for you ?

[HansUrbancka]

andy...You now appear to be getting down to earth on matters.

Accordingly, perhaps it is better if I regard you as someone to be treated with care, as i am of the belief (rightly or wrongly) that you are an AB Moderator. Your honest reply will be appreciated.

Hans

[Prudie]

I was also surprised at Spath's post, suppose it depends on recent? It's almost easier to list which Royal hasn't been divorced in the last 40 odd years. As listed those that have included Princesses Margaret and Anne and Princes Charles and Andrew (3 out of the Queen's 4 children). How many more do you want?

[smurfchops]

OK so give them their privacy. No more photos in the press, on the news, etc. But no privileges either. Pay for their own house to be refurbished out of their own money. You cannot have it all. I must admit I am starting to feel sorry for Harry...

[Tilly2]

I feel sorry for Meghan. I don't think she deserves all the backlash.

[Mamyalynne]

I feel for them both, having his wife torn to shreds in so many ways and not having the privilege to freely speak out about it(yet) would drive most Husbands crazy.

[pixie374]

I'm sure they are both aware that the media can and will say all sorts of things about them, which they have to just ignore. Hopefully... they will.

[andy-hughes]

Hans - // andy...You now appear to be getting down to earth on matters.

Accordingly, perhaps it is better if I regard you as someone to be treated with care, as i am of the belief (rightly or wrongly) that you are an AB Moderator. Your honest reply will be appreciated. //

My honest reply is that you can treat me however you wish, within Site Rules, I honestly could not care less.

Quite what my being a Moderator has to do with anything, I have absolutely no idea, but again, I am really not interested.

[HansUrbancka]

Thanks andy for your having confirmed in the final sentence of your latest posting that you are indeed a Moderator.

Cheers...Hans.