ChatterBank9 mins ago
How
14 Answers
Will boris impose tier what ever on greater Manchester .Ill be interested .
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by weecalf. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Burnham has capitulated:-
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ home/in dex.htm l
https:/
//Burnham has capitulated:-//
I'm not sure that's quite the case, Danny. It seems there has been no agreement. If that's the case the PM has no alternative but to impose the measures (not that I agree with them).
There are a number of potential conflicts here. Firstly, the Greater Manchester Police answer to Mr Burnham (there is no Police & Crime Commissioner for Manchester). Quite how they take their instructions from the Mayor is unclear but I imagine he has a say in setting their priorities. Secondly, Mr Burnham is suffering delusions of grandeur. He is an elected Mayor acting under devolved powers from Westminster, not a Feudal Lord operating his own personal feifdom. I admire him on one hand - the restrictions being imposed are pointless and ridiculous. But he cannot pick and choose which legislation he will "accept" and which he won't. The Westminster government has a duty to protect taxpayers' money. They can do so when it comes to Manchester. The scandal is that they cannot do so in Scotland, Wales and NI. In those provinces the UK taxpayers (predominantly the English) pick up the tab for policy decisions over which they have no control.
I'm not sure that's quite the case, Danny. It seems there has been no agreement. If that's the case the PM has no alternative but to impose the measures (not that I agree with them).
There are a number of potential conflicts here. Firstly, the Greater Manchester Police answer to Mr Burnham (there is no Police & Crime Commissioner for Manchester). Quite how they take their instructions from the Mayor is unclear but I imagine he has a say in setting their priorities. Secondly, Mr Burnham is suffering delusions of grandeur. He is an elected Mayor acting under devolved powers from Westminster, not a Feudal Lord operating his own personal feifdom. I admire him on one hand - the restrictions being imposed are pointless and ridiculous. But he cannot pick and choose which legislation he will "accept" and which he won't. The Westminster government has a duty to protect taxpayers' money. They can do so when it comes to Manchester. The scandal is that they cannot do so in Scotland, Wales and NI. In those provinces the UK taxpayers (predominantly the English) pick up the tab for policy decisions over which they have no control.
send in the enforcers?
https:/ /cdn.on ebauer. media/o ne/empi re-tmdb /films/ 602/ima ges/ewM SszqEvI 3G1U21S fYbOeoK dxS.jpg
https:/
// I think he'll impose it, if Manchester is as fed up as it would appear, not many will adhere to it,
the £10 000 fine is sort of fill out form job and not a court case in the future job so I think closed will be closed
and so it came to pass - we all support AB in the "one case does NOT fit all" idea
the £10 000 fine is sort of fill out form job and not a court case in the future job so I think closed will be closed
and so it came to pass - we all support AB in the "one case does NOT fit all" idea