Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Anti-Semitic Posts V Anti Islam Posts.
201 Answers
It seems to me that AB has lots of OP's attacking Islam and Muslims in general, but not many OP's attacking Jews.
Anti-semitism seems to be considered shocking, but anti-Islam seems to be considered quite acceptable.
What do you think?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Atheist. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
sorry some abers, but this is bigger then gaza and all the terror that in itself entails, this social cohesion mantra, has im afraid, shown there is none, just people getting fedup, who are the interlopers here, who let off bombs stabbed murdered, i think peeps are as i said fedup, muslims are victims, gaza is not the uk, i get the.. i feel for the innocent, who does not! who startted it..hamas who raped and murdered concert goers, oh sorry they did not have a hard life in gazam nothing to do woth them personally, but hey killem anyway.....
Lets discuss Manchester arena, London bus bombings. Unerground tube bomb, 9/11. London bridge knife maniac, Reading Park maniac/ knife murderer. No apologies by me. They were Muslim.
Please can ABers suggest any Jewish extremist bombers and murderers in the UK in the last 30 years or more. You can add Islam domestic honour killings if you like.
The view that islam, and the religious political baggage and social violence that it brings is to be interpreted as a pro Jewish or Israel stance is just another excersise in looking through the telescope from the wrong end. It is a clumsy deflection tactic to camouflage anti semitism. As yet, like many others, I have no qualms regarding the Jewish people who live amongst us or visit us. There appear to be no random explosions or knife attacks, no corrrosive spillages or runaway vehicles that mount the pavements into crowded areas, threats to visit violence on families of our elected politicians or their families and homes. No desecration of our own sacred institutions or institutes and certainly no organised rape and sexual abuse of our indigenous children. My objection to these acts is now described as against muslims and their ways of doing things. A part of that judgement is is correct, but only by default. But it is not because I am pro Jewish. The British once eliminated a political system called mahdism. Many will have no idea of its existace or reality. That is why we are in danger of letting parts of that vile existence into our once free Country where free thought was at one time encouraged and celebrated. There will be no such luxury when the terrorists take political power through the stalking horse called the labour party. The would be religious dictators seem to value your freedom more than you do if you are able to excuse their henious deeds.
My viewpoint is this: I refuse to judge anybody by the worst of their people. I won't judge Mohammed down the newsagents by the crimes committed by Hamas in Israel. I will not judge Shmuel in the bank by the acts by some Israelis against innocent Gazans. Likewise, I won't judge Alexei for the crimes being committed by Putin in Ukraine.
For some here, that makes me part of the problem. That makes me a terrorist sympathiser. So be it, if you want to accuse me of something I'm not, then knock yourself out, your opinion means nothing to me. The "if you're not with us, you're against us" is a mindset I don't share.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.