Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Scam Or What?
21 Answers
We have received payment for £160. 00 For ???? thank you.
Morris Wimbush sale@lexiconlifeline, please download Receipt.
Have you had one?
Morris Wimbush sale@lexiconlifeline, please download Receipt.
Have you had one?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by TWR. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Hi, lovely........and my scam or whatever it was wasn't opened......nosey though I am...
I'm fine thanks....fit and happy.....MrG has been dead for six and a half years....but in spirit he's fine...and getting the same earache from me as he did when he was alive...
Well I have to blame someone.....☺
I'm fine thanks....fit and happy.....MrG has been dead for six and a half years....but in spirit he's fine...and getting the same earache from me as he did when he was alive...
Well I have to blame someone.....☺
There was a time when sending large files by email would inconvenience the sender just as much as the recipient, in that a large attachment would hog the telephone line (no signal splitters then!) for an unacceptable length of time.
In the broadband era attachments come down the line in a split second. Zero inconvenience to the receiver and you could write back to insist on an uncompressed version of the attachment (can't hide executable files in that form), with the reasonable excuse that your virus protection warned you not to open the .arj, .zip etc.
The only person who needs to compress their attachments is someone sending out -large- numbers of identical items. Therefore, what appears to be unique to you cannot be unique. If it's not unique, who gains: them or you?
In the broadband era attachments come down the line in a split second. Zero inconvenience to the receiver and you could write back to insist on an uncompressed version of the attachment (can't hide executable files in that form), with the reasonable excuse that your virus protection warned you not to open the .arj, .zip etc.
The only person who needs to compress their attachments is someone sending out -large- numbers of identical items. Therefore, what appears to be unique to you cannot be unique. If it's not unique, who gains: them or you?
@Brinjal
In your case, if they've got the name of the person you helped right, then it might be genuine.
Try and get a postal address for the solicitors, then write to them and try to get them to state the same thing in writing.
In theory, all they should need is the name to make the cheque out to.
Note: cheque books are being withdrawn by banks but not yet. We will have to get used to dishing out our bank details, in future.
If in doubt, speak to your bank and ask what could happen to your account if somone possessed both your bank account details and a copy of your signature?
In your case, if they've got the name of the person you helped right, then it might be genuine.
Try and get a postal address for the solicitors, then write to them and try to get them to state the same thing in writing.
In theory, all they should need is the name to make the cheque out to.
Note: cheque books are being withdrawn by banks but not yet. We will have to get used to dishing out our bank details, in future.
If in doubt, speak to your bank and ask what could happen to your account if somone possessed both your bank account details and a copy of your signature?