Donate SIGN UP

More "Self Defence"

Avatar Image
Untitled | 09:07 Sat 21st Oct 2023 | News
126 Answers

https://www.reuters.com/world/orthodox-church-says-it-was-hit-by-israeli-air-strike-gaza-2023-10-20/
 

an israeli airstrike is confirmed to have hit an orthodox christian church where hundreds of palestinian christians were taking shelter including elderly people women and children... 16 fatalities are so far confirmed but clearing of the rubble has only just begun 

israel claims that a hamas command centre was "nearby" 

how can this be a justifiable means of self-defence?

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 126rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Untitled. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

//how can this be a justifiable means of self-defence?//

 

The answer is in your link.

 

//The Israeli military said its fighter jets had hit a nearby command and control centre that was used to carry out attacks against Israel.//

Women children and Hamas fighters.

Just like "Israel bombed a hospital (carpark)

Humans are always 'collateral damage' in a war. Reports of innocents being killed always makes for good propaganda too. 

Question Author

does that make blowing up civilians and refugees ok then naomi? 

Question Author

collateral damage is a euphemism for "casualties we don't care about". it is a deceitful phrase. 
 

israel cannot surely just kill whoever it likes in retaliation can it?

Ask Hamas, untitled.  It's what they do all the time.

Question Author

i know what their answer is naomi... they would say "yes". what's yours?

Question Author

actually i think i know what yours is too

Don't start on me, untitled.  I didn't start this war.

Question Author

avoiding the question again

Still with you on all this Untitled but staying away from the News Section to avoid being insulted further.  

"israel cannot surely just kill whoever it likes in retaliation can it?"

why not, Hamas who you clearly support have done it and are still doing it ?

Not at all.  We've spoken about this a number of times.  Which bit of wars always carry with them collaterol damage don't you understand?

Expecting a war not to have innocent civilian casualties is a bit naive. I've merely pointed out that this is what they are (assuming the reports aren't propaganda). It doesn't mean I'm not appalled by the flaring up of this ridiculous war and its consequences. I'm simply being realistic. 

Question Author

I don't support hamas baz

think carefully about what you are saying... do you truly believe that israel has the right to kill absolutely anyone in retaliation? even the sick, elderly, or children? that is much closer to the attitude of hamas than what i am saying

Question Author

but it's not "warfare" to bomb a church full of refugees is it zacs... it's just mass killing

So, wise one... how should Israel react then?

"actually i think i know what yours is too"

same as your thinking when you posted that you mean...
youre another on here that will just keep gong round in circles.

Why are you dwelling on alledged Israeli deeds and not focusing on those terrorist scum Hamas who started it all ?

//More "self defence"// - More victims of Hamas, they started it, end of.

Question Author

end the siege and allow gazan civilians to leave 

supply fatah and organise a counter-coup in gaza 

1 to 20 of 126rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

More "Self Defence"

Answer Question >>