Donate SIGN UP

Nhs Funding

Avatar Image
Paigntonian | 20:32 Thu 14th Jul 2022 | News
20 Answers
How many more billions do we have to give the NHS so that they stop whinging about a lack of resources?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 20rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Paigntonian. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
there is no limit, it needs efficiency improvements not money.
Question Author
Tora: Agree.
The NHS is totally mismanaged
Too top heavy managerial wise. It pays exorbitant prices for some basic medicine. Paracetamol for example.
//It pays exorbitant prices for some basic medicine. Paracetamol for example.//
Thats sometimes claimed but is there any evidence of that?
And in the scheme of things does it make much difference out of £150 billion or whatever pa.
We would probly have to double it to £300 billion before it would feel enough
the nhs barely prescribes paracetamol tablets - only in very specific circumstances. I just looed on the BNF and 100 tablets are about £1.90 to the NHS.
Other preparations are more (iv for example) because they are more expensive to prepare in bulk
Does anyone remember a programme quite a while back when a businessman walked around a hospital and pointed out so much that was wrong to do with efficiency improvements and he found out such a lot. No-one took any notice of course
The NHS is broken, it needs drastic reform but no one is willing to do it.

No amount of money would solve it, everytime more money is given a fair bit just ends up in management/admin not where it is needed.

Until it collapses under the weight of useless and greedy management noting will be considered, and then it will be too late.
//he nhs barely prescribes paracetamol tablets -//

AB at its finest again. It's not just the 'paracetamol' though is it. There are many, many things that do add up.
Underfunding and understaffed and long waiting lists, the NHS has reached a crisis in its history and maybe a debate needs to be had about what a reliable and fit for purpose service looks like for the future. For a start how about devolution with the regions having total control of management and budgets to be able to deliver their own good service?.
Usual Story, more chiefs than Indians. Time to get rid of the ( much to many ) chiefs.
This week I have had to go to 4 different hospitals, 4 different appointments, 4 completely different places………. Ridiculous!
//Does anyone remember a programme quite a while back when a businessman walked around a hospital and pointed out so much that was wrong to do with efficiency improvements and he found out such a lot.//
Yes... maybe the NHS needs some management/business consultants like say KPMG to do a detailed review and come up with efficiency improvements and reorganisation/transfamation. Has that ever been tried?
//This week I have had to go to 4 different hospitals, 4 different appointments, 4 completely different places………. Ridiculous!//
Yes does happen although 4 sounds alot ... but maybe thats because there trying to get you the first available appt for whatevers needed rather than waiting until slots are available at your local hospital
There are some admin things that just cause me to scratch my head. For exampleL
1) for a recent appointment I was sent a big several pages form to fill in with all sorts of health details, lifestyle, medications, past ops and I were told to bring with me to the appointment. but when i got there I wasnt asked for so i offered it and they said we dont need it.
2) I got notified of an appointment by phone for a procedure (maybe theyd had a cancellation). The procedure was a few day's later and went well. But about 5 days AFTER the procedure I recieved a big information pack in the post confirming my appointment and various booklets about the procedure, what to expect, forms to fill in ect
That would imply they have insufficient resources locally. All hospitals should have some reserve capacity; 100% efficiency is not a practical goal.
Would the American model work better?
If you can pay you get the best treatment that money can buy. If not you join the back if an ever increasing queue.
I think that you, more or less, answered your own question, Sandy. Civilised health care is for all, not just the wealthy.
Nhs is infested with profiteering third parties who’ve given a wedge to the tories to keep it that way… it isn’t necessarily about money but legalised corruption siphoning away public investment.
No good pouring money in while there's a Tory Government - it just goes on ineffective profiteering from their Rich Cronies (remember PPI).

1 to 20 of 20rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Nhs Funding

Answer Question >>