Hancock The Baby.

[teacake44]

Hancock scared to death to face Piers Morgan and his Questions. This is your so called health minister, who is now dictating to employers that they are responsible for providing PPE in the work place to ensure there safety, this is the guy, that for weeks has failed to protect his own staff on the front line with PPE, not only failed, but the eye protection goggles he did provide where 3/4 years out of date, but insisted that they had been re- tested, but when asked to provide details of the testing, (couldn't) so has now re-called all this PPE, and condemned it, why? he was telling more porkies.
Funny how now after weeks of saying that face masks don't help, that both him and Boris are now recommending them, and to make sure that the so called safety guide lines are followed by employers ( whatever they may be?) are now spending 15 million on employing government jobworths to do spot checks on safety in the work place. Who was spot checking Matt Hancock? Get ready for the next wave of deaths, big time. Oh and I was right about face masks. What happening here is, this government can't come up with a plan, so the next big wave of deaths will be blamed onto the employers shoulders.

[Zacs-Master]

Show me where I’ve transgressed Site Rules, Steg.

[steg]

Show me where I’ve said you have?

[teacake44]

Just to add to my post, If government are only following scientific advice, then the recommendations to wear face masks must have come from them. :0)

[Zacs-Master]

Oh, come on, Steggy, being coy doesn’t suit you. If you didn’t mean I transgressed Site Rules, then what, precisely, did you mean?

[steg]

Emm Zacky, I’ve not even mentioned you

[THECORBYLOON]

TEACAKE, when did Hancock "[dictate] to employers that they are responsible for providing PPE in the work place to ensure there safety"?

Are employers not already responsible for the health and safety of their employees?

[Zacs-Master]

Steggy, come on, man.

You quoted me and then wrote ‘ Aye, But not against Site Rules’. Precisely what point did you intend to make by doing that?

[THECORBYLOON]

Why can some folk not see the difference between face MASKS and face COVERINGS?

[teacake44]

12.12 this is the true zac, trying to turn every post into a personal argument, thus destroying the thread for his own satisfaction, day in day out.

[Zacs-Master]

Because it suits their agenda of ‘Labour voting sore loser’.

[teacake44]

12.10Todays TV.

[Zacs-Master]

Teacake, your whole OP is nothing but a personal argument. One which fails to recognise, yet again, that there’s a worldwide PPE shortage and one which contains inaccuracies which have made you look a bit daft again.

[teacake44]

12.10 Of course in there pacific work place, including insurance for them. but I wouldn't think their workplace insurance covers the staff for a pandemic would you?

[Zacs-Master]

Pacific.....LOL. Well, there should be oceans of rom between workers I suppose.

[THECORBYLOON]

Do you have more details or a link TEACAKE?

What about employers' existing responsibilities toward their employees' health and safety? Why should they not provide additional PPE, IF required?

[teacake44]

Carry on with your person attacks, I shall continue with the thread.

[steg]

“//, Steg. Then there’s the others who”s contributions are concisely snide, if somewhat hippocritical.//

Aye, But not against Site Rules”

Simply means it’s not against Site Rules to be “hippocritical” or snide.

[Zacs-Master]

Really, why?

[ToraToraTora]

so we are talking about people working in the pacific?

[CrapAtCryptics]

Double zzzzzz