Crosswords23 mins ago
Fao Naomi
102 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by spathiphyllum. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.OG's post also misses the mark. England, Northern Ireland and Scotland have differing legal systems, and the cases were also slightly different, so it's not all that surprising that the judgements may be different.
And, for that matter, the fact that it's called a "judgement" and not a "proof" should give the game away: it's always down at least somewhat to an interpretation of how law applies to a given case.
And, for that matter, the fact that it's called a "judgement" and not a "proof" should give the game away: it's always down at least somewhat to an interpretation of how law applies to a given case.
Corby, The English High Court rendered this decision:-
https:/ /www.in stitute forgove rnment. org.uk/ explain ers/cou rt-chal lenges- proroga tion
https:/
And, again, ZM: what is the point of trying to use an English Court in the Summer when it isn't even sitting?!
Political naivety indeed. There's a legal process to follow: the judges involved are independent; the judgements they've reached may or may not be upheld when it comes to the Supreme Court, but when that decision is made it will have the respect of every party concerned.
Political naivety indeed. There's a legal process to follow: the judges involved are independent; the judgements they've reached may or may not be upheld when it comes to the Supreme Court, but when that decision is made it will have the respect of every party concerned.
The High Court case. But you must have seen it, surely?
https:/ /www.ju diciary .uk/wp- content /upload s/2019/ 09/Mill er-No-F INAL-1. pdf
https:/