Donate SIGN UP

Answers

61 to 80 of 252rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by agchristie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
AH, you carry on declining then. Fine by me.
naomi - // Pixie, I'm not sure why you're talking about 'adults'. Jo Brands 'humour' isn't restricted to the over 18s. //

Neither in 'incitement' - and the point that I believe Pixie is making, and I am absolutely making, is that to conjure incitement out of humour as an abstract debating point, as you are, takes a leap of imagination that I regard as invalid.

Of course, if someone wishes to act on Ms. Brand's proposition, and then refer to her as having 'incited' them to do it - what odds would you give that for a legal defence in court?
I like my comedy to be completely edgy, to push boundaries, and to induce a sharp intake of breath from the more delicate among us, and I know people will judge me for this, but I found the Frankie Boyle joke about Jordan funny (although his joke about Princess Diana and minefields was funnier). I found the utterly hilarious Ross/Brand/Sachs thing sidesplittingly funny, but it's horses for courses because some people went completely bananas about this (can you believe that was over 10 years ago???).

I have never been offended by a comedian.

As a rule I don't find Brand funny, as so much of her routines in the past have centered around how fat she is and it all got a bit samey, but this did raise a small smile.

She's a comedian and she used the tools of hyperbole and shock, as many comedians do, so I'm struggling to understand all the fuss, so for me it was comedy and not incitement. To suggest the latter is to suggest Brand actually wants people to do this - and there's no way she does.

(Cue the "you wouldn't find it funny if your child/wife/whatever was a victim of an acid attack" comments).

Comedy is entirely subjective. On the rare occasions I've caught Dad's Army, it has always struck me as puerile and not even remotely funny, and yet I am aware, and respect, that many people find it brilliant.
Yes. If the question was should children watch, then that might be different. But this was about the possibility of someone throwing battery acid. Which seems to be an "adult" thing mostly.
Deskdiary - I think you raise a valid point about comedy, and the fact that it is entirely subjective, as I have already pointed out.

The simple fact is, any comedian who is not attracting an audience, and that means people find him or her funny, is not going to be around for very long.

The fact that Ms Brand, and indeed Mr Boyle, are highly successful comedians proves that they have an audience.

They may not be mutually compatible audiences, but that is the joy of humour, it's a broad church.
"As a rule I don't find Brand funny, as so much of her routines in the past have centered around how fat she is and it all got a bit samey, but this did raise a small smile.
"

Something something about my or your husband. -.- Yes, i agree with you DD.
And it is meant to be. There are so many different types of humour, any of which could offend someone who desperately wanted to be offended. It's better to stick to those you personally like and avoid those you don't, rather than censoring the lot.
//Which seems to be an "adult" thing mostly. //

Not necessarily. google 'acid thrown by youths'. One of the reports deems acid the new knife - or words to that effect.
More so than adults? I'll believe you.... but anyone who has done that because of a joke they have heard... is just looking for an excuse.
Pixie, //More so than adults? //

Acid attacks are acid attacks.
Obviously, but that wasn't the conversation... it was about incitement.
Question Author
I'm fairly ambivalent about Jo Brand. Some of her output I have found quite funny and the dry way she delivers. She mocks herself quite a bit concerning her physique and reluctance to exercise.

There are many comedians I don't find funny but others think they are hilarious. This applies to comedy TV too.

Many AB'ers know I have a humerous side but I didn't think Jo's comments were very funny but proving incitement would be a very difficult matter altogether.
Pixie, I know that. What I don't know is why you're banging on about adults.

I've said my bit on this for the time being.
My thoughts largely echo those of Desk Diary above with the addition that I also like some gentle light humour as balance.

Hand up anyone else who hears a joke/comment on TV etc and says out loud - 'That will start a thread on AB tomorrow'.

Naomi, because i had said that adults are responsible for their own behaviour... you can't necessarily claim that children are. I'm sure you have followed the thread, and know that I am saying that adults cannot be incited without their permission.
If you want to change to children... just let me know x
I like so many different types, mamya. I can see how people might be offended by some, but also that a joke is supposed to be half silly/ half real. You shouldn't take jokes seriously :-)
//If you want to change to children... just let me know x //

That, along with the disingenuous 'x' is beneath you.

You carry on.
Now, 'Carry ons' never hit the mark with my funny bone.
Ooh Matron!
It was a friendly question... who is responsible for children or adult's behaviour? I will leave it open then x

61 to 80 of 252rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.