We cross posted. I was talking about yet another of your silly cartoon things.
As for the rest of your rubbish, read this and learn about the Tunisian you conveniently call Lahouaiej-Bouhlel. Your post is an insult to his victims.
AOG - // No the fools are the ones who don't admit the obvious. //
What is 'obvious' is that some people are taking two and two and making twenty-two.
You may be proved right, but as we write, no accusations of terrorism have been brought, to as you are assuming, and there is nothing 'obvious' about that, except that you do it a lot.
/// That means you (that's the 'we that AOG represents of course) are assuming on the basis of probability, which is fine, as long as you present your opinion as such. ///
"The guy was mentally ill. That is all there is to it." - well it could be argued that anyone who believes any flavour of religious cobras is on the radio rental side!
Naomi - // In instances like this assumptions based on experience prevent one presenting oneself interminably as a useful idiot. //
I have no problem with anyone taking two and two and making twenty-two - I do think that clarifying that are making an assumption based on your own view of the situation (I wouldn't use the word 'experience' either) is more appropriate than trying to come on like some pipe-puffing beard-stroking guru on matters of terrorism,