I can't see why you'd be evicted from home by the court for indecent exposure. As for criminal damage I can't see why either, But maybe the landlord might seek to have you evicted if the damage was to the property or you flashed at other tenants
If you rent your property, you landlord can apply to a court order for eviction on certain grounds under the Housing Act 1988 (as amended in 1996).
One of the grounds for granting of such an order would appear to be covered under Ground 14 of this Act.
it depends apparently on whether the guilty party is the leaseholder or not
and the answer is ... very unlikely
I applied to the court to evict a tenant whose CHILD had been convicted of assaulting other younger children with threats of force
"Show me your w ---- or I will hit you"
and he took time off to tell me that I had applied at the end of the lease so I had a right to possession and I would not have been given it otherwise ---that is in the middle of a lease.
wind on ten years and I am told it may be different nowadays
basically the principle seems to be that convicted people who are not in prison have to live somewhere and it makes life easier for the authorities if they dont have to rehouse everyone who goes thro a court
I don't think he will be evicted if this was an isolated incident. If it has happened before, there is a slight possibility. He would probably get into more trouble with the law for damage to your property. Its a funny old law isn't it?
I would love to own a taser gun, and if anyone gets 'there not to be seen' bits out in public...you can imagine where my taser would point lol
I'm being told that despite him being convicted on two charges. Even though the council have moved to have him evicted the judge doing the evicting won't through him out.
I dont think the trial judge has the power to evict.
I think the civil action has to be brought by the landlord ( council ) in another court. The grounds for throwing out for misbehaviour are discretionary - and as I said above the judge took time off to say he wouldnt have done it
however as someone else said, times change.
Clearly not for you and me