Donate SIGN UP

Max Clifford - 8 Years

Avatar Image
chrissa1 | 15:35 Fri 02nd May 2014 | News
40 Answers
I am betting he wasn't expecting that.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 40rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by chrissa1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
consecutively is NOT all at the same time
You're confusing 'consecutive' with 'concurrent'
A simple grammatical mistake chaps. The important thing is that this smug
bast*rd is now behind bars.
///Sentencing the PR man, Judge Anthony Leonard said he had groomed and degraded his victims.

Mr Leonard ruled that Clifford should serve his eight sentences of between six and 24 months consecutively.///

One after the other....
I wonder if his conviction will have any impact on those celebrities he has represented during their own sexual assault accusations? Will the public now wonder if those he ran PR for were really as innocent as he claimed?
-- answer removed --
I suppose as a sex offender he won't have too pleasant a time of it while he's inside.
He will be housed in the area put aside for sex offenders I would imagine, they usually are kept away from the 'general population' if possible.
-- answer removed --
An 'old lag' aquaintance of mine once regaled me with anecdotes of the punishments meted out by the 'superior' normal criminals. I don't envy him.
-- answer removed --
How do you know what Wormwood Scrubs is like - been there, first hand experience?

He'll do 6-9 months in a prison and then be moved to an open one for the remainder of his custodial - which ever way you cut it, subject to contrition and behaviour, would be 2.75 years and then parole/tagging.
it seems unusual for the judge to order that the sentences be served consecutively, concurrent seems much more normal practice (not that i have intimate knowledge). It seems crazy that he gets more prison time than some murderers
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
i hope he kills himself in there. peadophiles are evil depraved monsters.
Black C: it seems unusual for the judge to order that the sentences be served consecutively, concurrent seems much more normal practice (not that i have intimate knowledge).

yeah I thought that might be grounds for an appeal

The law says you ahve to sentence according to principles applying at the time of the offence - and if concurrent sentences werent the norm,
then there are grounds for a reduction

I am not sure if I want judges thinking or doing: I know I should do X ( int his case give a shorter sentence ) so I know ! I will get around doing X by er doing Y...

I am not sure if he did some of it you know
I am reminded about the Irish Bombers.... the longer that this case goes on the more I am convinced of your guilt et c etc
well peter, YOU don't have to be sure.
I don't think he has a case for an Appeal.

21 to 40 of 40rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Max Clifford - 8 Years

Answer Question >>