Donate SIGN UP

Human rights?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 16:18 Thu 19th Feb 2009 | News
29 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-114862 2/Preacher-hate-awarded-2-500-judges-rule-jail ing-breached-human-rights.html

Yet one more reason this person will never be got rid of.

It's all to do with breaching his human rights.

The other side of the coin to all those that still maintain that we should accept all these asylum seekers.

Being so tolerant makes us the laughing stock of the world.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 29 of 29rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
Oneeyedvic

Most people went to war (and certainly this country did) because Hitler was killing people and had annexed Austria and then Poland. Nothing to do with the safety of people in this country.

If we had not gone to war with Germany, are you really naive enough to believe that Herr Hitler would not have put the safety of the British people at risk?

If you had been around during this period in time, I suppose you would have been the type to hold your hands in the air, and then been prepared to live your life under the Nazi jackboot, or maybe join their SS.

It frightens me that one day we will have to depend on people such as you to hold onto and protect everthing we hold dear.

AOG obviously hasn't got the same sense of humour as supernick!

Immigrants are can't be all bad news are they,? Which of the immigrant doctors and nurses, hospital porters et al which have been key to running our health service over the years should we not have admitted? None, presumably.

What's the distinction that we are drawing? That
a foreign nurse or hospital worker should be here doing a job which could be done by a Briton, but a Polish electrician or labourer shouldn't?
Question Author
And thank goodness I haven't, because if you also found supermick's offensive and aggressive post at all humourous, then I am afraid you are as twisted as he is.
AOG you were being teased, that's all. Supernick patently wasn't being absolutely serious. (If he was well, dammit, he should have a lot more respect for his elders.Not like that when I was a boy , by Jove. When I was in Poona.....)
Yeah, come on, AOG. Grow up. It was just a bit of mickey-taking.
If you had been around during this period in time, I suppose you would have been the type to hold your hands in the air, and then been prepared to live your life under the Nazi jackboot, or maybe join their SS.

Hey, I'm not the one who collects mementos of Nazi memorabilia.

If we had not gone to war with Germany, are you really naive enough to believe that Herr Hitler would not have put the safety of the British people at risk?

There is a big difference between an invading army and criminals in the street.

We went to war to stop an army. We didn't go to war to stop thugs in the street.

But then you were there so I thought you would have know that.

Still haven't answered my question though - who exactly is laughing at us?
Crikey. come on AOG, let's have a cuddle.

Still, I guess being a hand wringing liberal, I'm not allowed to invoke the spirit of the war dead as we know that they only stood for imperial measurements, the stand against the PC brigade, and chasing those rascally Muslims out of the empire.
Question Author
chasing those rascally Muslims out of the empire.

You mean like the Sikhs & Hindus wish to chase them out of India?
Quite right, Supernick and AOG. Get the moslems out of India.Haven't they got their own countries to go to, Pakistan and Bangladesh? What was the point in creating East and West Pakistan if moslems wouldn't use them ? LOL [LOL for the benefit of AOG . Can't be having him think I'm racist (or Politically Correct, come to that !)]

21 to 29 of 29rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Human rights?

Answer Question >>