Taking Plods Away From Nicking Villains To Clean Up The Met......

[ToraToraTora]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65165279
.....ok I know they have issues but seriously? Crims must be laughing their swedes off.

[perseverer]

Are police officers committing crimes not villains?

[THECORBYLOON]

"In January, after Carrick's guilty plea, the Met announced plans to recheck staff accused of domestic abuse and sexual violence in the 10 years to April 2022.

Of 1,131 individuals reinvestigated:

246 will face no formal action because correct action was taken at the time

689 will undergo a new assessment to pursue new or missed lines of inquiry, including possibly talking again to victims and witnesses

196 face formal risk management measures and potentially a review to determine if they should remain in the force"

[drmorgans]

Issues? Murder, kidnap, rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, using police computer to identify vulnerable victims then shagging them. That's hardly letting them off a speeding fine is it?

[jno]

why would crims like this? It may affect some of their best mates.

[douglas9401]

I think someone's 'avin' a giraffe.

[drmorgans]

Bestiality too?

[douglas9401]

It's a tall order.

[Old_Geezer]

Crims won't be laughing, they're concerned that they'll be losing their job at the Met in a few years' time.

[ToraToraTora]

hang on jno+OG? who'd have thunk it!

[Peter Pedant]

Foo day foo! - or some other brainless slang

Mark Rowley has had 6 mo for this, and the job has to be done - as Robert Mark said 1964 - the met should nick more criminals than it employs.

The hotline where you DON'T report police sexual crimes to er more police has had thousands of strikes

[Peter Pedant]

why would crims like this? It may affect some of their best mates..... in the force

[youngmafbog]

HoHoHo, hark at the usual.

TTTis correct, officers should not be moved there is no need, this is a civilian task, at least initially.

Most of it seems to me to be being done to tick the boxes of the howling crowds rather than sort the real problem.

[Peter Pedant]

TTTis correct, officers should not be moved there is no need, this is a civilian task, at least initially.

erk well no
we are back 20 y wivvda doctors after Shipman.
Only doctors can judge doctors was changed to lay people judging doctors ( GMC) . Not a raving success but the govt said they were doing it anyway

oh er for slow ABers - read police for doctors, disciplinary for GMC, Carrick for Shipman

[Peter Pedant]

Most of it seems to me to be being done to tick the boxes of the howling crowds

nope

obviously wrong - the public ( bofe girls and boys) want police that dont er rape them. Tick Boxing will not do. Normal Good Friday on AB then

Sir Mark ( bless ) has come up with an obvious civil legal point. - Ha
He cant fire personnel on rules he made up later
I mean durrrr!
So that if a policeman has given notice of a conviction on interview then it is rather obvioous to me ( even tho I am an ABer) that you then cant use that to fire him post facto ( = after, but in ancient forrin)

so that if the interviewee has said - "yeah I go' done for rape yeah but all I did was slap her around a bit. An foo who aint done dat den"
and the cttee has said - yes yes just the man for Vice or Armed Crime or....Protection
then they cant fire him

jesus

[tomus42]

I think it needs to be done.