Society & Culture1 min ago
Interesting
21 Answers
If a golfer moves the ball and does not admit he is lambasted ,if a snooker player moves the ball he admits it so the other player gains from the incident .So why can a footballer dive to get a penalty and not a word .
Answers
If a player "attempts to deceive the referee e.g. by feigning injury or pretending to have been fouled ( simulation)" he must be cautioned. See page 106: https://img. fifa.com/ima ge/upload/kh hloe2xoigyna 8juxw3.pdf However a problem arises when a player is genuinely fouled but then 'makes a meal of it'. As an example, two opposing players might be...
21:19 Sun 06th Jun 2021
If a player "attempts to deceive the referee e.g. by feigning injury or pretending to have been fouled (simulation)" he must be cautioned. See page 106:
https:/ /img.fi fa.com/ image/u pload/k hhloe2x oigyna8 juxw3.p df
However a problem arises when a player is genuinely fouled but then 'makes a meal of it'.
As an example, two opposing players might be jumping together in the penalty area to head the ball. The defender gives the forward a very tiny nudge in the back, which would be just enough to knock him out of prime position to receive the incoming cross. The defender though is determined that the referee shouldn't miss the incident, so he throws himself forward onto the ground as if he's received a mighty shove (which he clearly hasn't). The referee then correctly awards a penalty (because of the tiny nudge to the forward's back) but the spectators all see it as 'diving'.
[That's written from the perspective of someone who's refereed hundreds of football matches. A lot of complaints about 'diving' actually only relate to a player, who has genuinely been fouled, deciding to 'make a meal of it', which isn't against the rules].
https:/
However a problem arises when a player is genuinely fouled but then 'makes a meal of it'.
As an example, two opposing players might be jumping together in the penalty area to head the ball. The defender gives the forward a very tiny nudge in the back, which would be just enough to knock him out of prime position to receive the incoming cross. The defender though is determined that the referee shouldn't miss the incident, so he throws himself forward onto the ground as if he's received a mighty shove (which he clearly hasn't). The referee then correctly awards a penalty (because of the tiny nudge to the forward's back) but the spectators all see it as 'diving'.
[That's written from the perspective of someone who's refereed hundreds of football matches. A lot of complaints about 'diving' actually only relate to a player, who has genuinely been fouled, deciding to 'make a meal of it', which isn't against the rules].
If a golfer moves a ball and doesn't own up, it depends if anyone witnessed him/her doing it. If it was witnessed, it wouldn't just be a lambasting; it could mean a suspension or expulsion from the club, which may mean that person would never be able to join another golf club. I can assure you, as a former golf club secretary, that the stigma attached would follow that person for ever. As the Great Bard said; To thine own self be true!
Players can be suspended for simulation even if they weren't booked during the match, as detailed in this link.
https:/ /www.go ogle.co m/amp/s /mobile .reuter s.com/a rticle/ amp/idU KKBN1DM 27I
https:/