Donate SIGN UP

John Terry Guilty of misconduct

Avatar Image
Gromit | 15:21 Thu 27th Sep 2012 | News
27 Answers
The Football Association charged Mr Terry on Friday 27 July 2012 with using abusive and/or insulting words and/or behaviour towards Queens Park Rangers’ Anton Ferdinand and which included a reference to colour and/or race contrary to FA Rule E3[2] in relation to the Queens Park Rangers FC versus Chelsea FC fixture at Loftus Road on 23 October 2011.

http://www.thefa.com/...ring-result-september

Somewhat contradicts the magistrates verdict?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 27rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Has he been charged twice with the same offence? Acquitted in a proper court and fined in a kangaroo one?
£220,000 fine. Good.
I'm not a fan of Terry particularly but I can't help thinking the FA have made a right hash of this. If a real court of law have acquited him then surely the FA should have abandoned this action.
Can anyone explain why it takes 4 days (5 in the actual court case) to discuss something that took just seconds on a football pitch.
The Magistrate said it was almost inconceivable that Mr Terry was innocent.

And yet, in the absence of clear recorded evidence, he was bound, very reluctantly, to enter a verdict of Not Guilty.

In other words ... I know damn well you are guilty.
sandyroe - The FA had to put their misconduct hearing on hold when criminal charges for racial abuse were preferred by the CPS.

Contractual misconduct and criminal racial abuse are not the same thing.

Terry admitted in court to using the words which were racial and abusive even if he did not use them (as he says) in a racist or abusive manner.

Just the use of the C word amounts to misconduct according to the FA, even if used in jest.
220k fine for a bit of name calling???

Pathetic, over the top and totally out of context

Football's a mans game but it's descended into 'He's called me a name so I'm taking my ball home'

Once upon a time (before the PC brigade took over this country) if someone called you a name you called them something equally insulting back and it was over and done with
Wouldn't it be great if there was an ACTUAL 'PC brigrade'...you know, with a marching band and everything.
Wouldn't be allowed sp,......elf n safety! ;-)
Both cases made a mint of money for the lawyers.
" footballs a mans game......." - Is it really? Can they all stop whinning and pretending they are injured now then - PMSL
The PC brigade would never have a marching band sp - too militaristic, with music not reflective enough of the cultural and ethnic mix of modern society.
^ :) ^
-- answer removed --
"£220k, cor blimey guvs, you're ffing bent as a Caribbean palm tree - bad as them bleedin' Fifa corrupt asses"
£220,00 mere pocket money for top footie players
I would hope that the FA hearing was fair and square. It would be a pity to learn that David Gill (Manchester United Chief Executive) may have voted for the four-match ban on Terry, purely because Chelsea play Man U in a few weeks' time.

I would never suggest that though.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Suarez got double as a punishment for his acrobatic diving in the box

1 to 20 of 27rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

John Terry Guilty of misconduct

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.