ChatterBank2 mins ago
Jailed For "hate"
30 Answers
http://
The pair were arrested last May over the distribution of leaflets and posting of online videos during a rape trial at Canterbury Crown Court involving three Muslim men and a teenager, who were later convicted and jailed. Nothing they said has been proven to be untrue, so is speaking the truth now 'hate'?
The pair were arrested last May over the distribution of leaflets and posting of online videos during a rape trial at Canterbury Crown Court involving three Muslim men and a teenager, who were later convicted and jailed. Nothing they said has been proven to be untrue, so is speaking the truth now 'hate'?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I guess if they had merely shouted 'Rapists' or 'Nonces', they would not have been arrested. It is obvious from your link that they went much further, hurling racist and religious abuse. Which, of course, are deemed as hate crimes. And, equally obvious is the fact that they used this case to highlight their own political beliefs and had nothing whatsoever to do with protecting anyone.
Well considering they targetted the wrong people, I cannot see how their abuse could be true, because they attacked innocent people.
So yes, calling someone a rapist who was not the person on trial is hateful.
The numpties filmed their own crimes and posted them on-line, aggravating the distress to their innocent victims.
Jayden also has the Northern Ireland Court case pending.
So yes, calling someone a rapist who was not the person on trial is hateful.
The numpties filmed their own crimes and posted them on-line, aggravating the distress to their innocent victims.
Jayden also has the Northern Ireland Court case pending.
I suppose you have to decide whether you think "It was a campaign to draw attention to the race, religion and immigrant background of the defendants" as the judge said, or if you think they would have acted the same regardless of race and religion.
They were stupid anyway as their actions could have hindered the prosecution of some nasty people.
They were stupid anyway as their actions could have hindered the prosecution of some nasty people.
// Fransen banged on the windows and doors of the shop and screamed "paedophile" and "foreigner".
However, in each case, they instead targeted innocent members of the public.
They filmed the abuse and then released it on social media and through the Britain First website. //
How would you like it if these muppets targetted YOU by mistake ?
However, in each case, they instead targeted innocent members of the public.
They filmed the abuse and then released it on social media and through the Britain First website. //
How would you like it if these muppets targetted YOU by mistake ?
Gromit; //How would you like it if these muppets targetted YOU by mistake ?//
If someone shouted abuse through my letterbox mistakenly thinking I was someone else, I would be puzzled and maybe annoyed, but I wouldn't think such action warranted them being sent to prison. A more appropriate sentence might be 4 hours spent tidying up my garden and chopping a few logs.
(Though they wouldn't have needed to shout through the letterbox as I would have opened the door and told them to p* off.)
If someone shouted abuse through my letterbox mistakenly thinking I was someone else, I would be puzzled and maybe annoyed, but I wouldn't think such action warranted them being sent to prison. A more appropriate sentence might be 4 hours spent tidying up my garden and chopping a few logs.
(Though they wouldn't have needed to shout through the letterbox as I would have opened the door and told them to p* off.)
Nice friends you have Khandro...
// Fransen, 32, went to the home of one defendant, Tamin Rahmani, and shouted ‘dirty Muslim rapist, come out’ through the door.
Mr Rahmani’s partner Kelli Best, who was pregnant at the time of the attack last May, blames Fransen for the stillborn birth of her daughter two days later.
Judge Justice Barron, sitting at Folkestone magistrates’ court, said it was ‘impossible’ to find Fransen responsible for the stillbirth but accepted her actions caused Ms Best stress at a difficult time. //
// Fransen, 32, went to the home of one defendant, Tamin Rahmani, and shouted ‘dirty Muslim rapist, come out’ through the door.
Mr Rahmani’s partner Kelli Best, who was pregnant at the time of the attack last May, blames Fransen for the stillborn birth of her daughter two days later.
Judge Justice Barron, sitting at Folkestone magistrates’ court, said it was ‘impossible’ to find Fransen responsible for the stillbirth but accepted her actions caused Ms Best stress at a difficult time. //
Well that's the kettle calling the pot black.
If the Police were not so PC and would go and find these peopple instead of bowing to a certain religion perhaps people would not be vigilantes. Vigilantes are usually there because of what they see as Plod inaction.
These to went right over the top, but so has the Judge with daft sentences which will simply fuel the far right's belief they are being unfairly targeted.
If the Police were not so PC and would go and find these peopple instead of bowing to a certain religion perhaps people would not be vigilantes. Vigilantes are usually there because of what they see as Plod inaction.
These to went right over the top, but so has the Judge with daft sentences which will simply fuel the far right's belief they are being unfairly targeted.
Ymb,
// Detective Inspector Bill Thornton of Kent Police said: ‘
‘They claimed to be exposing the men who had been accused of rape when in reality they knew little about the case in question and could have put the trial at risk due to their reckless actions.
‘It was the bravery of the female who was attacked and the tireless work of Kent Police detectives who ensured the men responsible are now serving a significant period of time behind bars, not because of any misguided attempt by Golding and Fransen to claim credit for their conviction. //
// Detective Inspector Bill Thornton of Kent Police said: ‘
‘They claimed to be exposing the men who had been accused of rape when in reality they knew little about the case in question and could have put the trial at risk due to their reckless actions.
‘It was the bravery of the female who was attacked and the tireless work of Kent Police detectives who ensured the men responsible are now serving a significant period of time behind bars, not because of any misguided attempt by Golding and Fransen to claim credit for their conviction. //
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|