Donate SIGN UP

Ronnie Biggs

Avatar Image
DEN53 | 19:43 Wed 01st Jul 2009 | ChatterBank
13 Answers
Just been reading in the Daily Mail - Jack Straw has turned down Biggs' for parole because he is 'totally unrependant'

Isn't it a shame the same attitude is not shown towards murderers, rapists, child abusers and terrorists.

I don't think Biggs would pose any threat to society, unlike some of the other scum walking the streets.

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by DEN53. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Exactly den,a lot of folk would disagree and start going on about the dead drivers family which is fair enough,but your point about sex offenders is spot on, i cant really remember murderes and terrorists being given freedom quick,unless you mean after their sentence which if served,then their debt has been repaid surely?
have to agree den, people have committed worse crimes and got off very lightly in comparison
Question Author
what I mean't Sarcas - is the lenient sentances the murderers, rapists, child abusers etc etc actually get.

Not many of them get 25 years like the train robbers did.

But then stealing money will always be more important than taking a life in our society........................
Yep,cut off heads,abuse whole nurserys,eat human flesh

But WOE BETIDE ANYONE THAT TOUCHES THE QUEENS CASH!

Bout time the judical system was given an overhaul,by force even,we need to take to the streets and install ""our own"" in the house of commons!
Lets hope my door is'nt kicked off at 4.00 am this morning by mi5,special branch and mi6 for my last comment,remember


fight the poweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeer!
Heard on the radio it was more to do with the train driver - his injuries received at the time contributed to his early death.

Personal thoughts he didn't give 2 hoots about the establishment and that's the reason.
DEN:

Sorry, mate, think you've missed the point: Biggs was obviously not prepared to lie whereas the other scum probably swear blind they're so sorry that the gullible prats fling the prison gates open wide and sling them out.

However, I've never been in favour of Biggs being released simply because he's elderly and in poor health, but that's another story.

But you certainly hit the nail on the head about the risk factor posed by a lot of the pond life jettisoned back into society, many to re-offend, often with horrific consequences.

I'm fed up metaphorically puking up as you hear yet another council/social services/probation apologist cacking on about how "lessons must be learned". If I hear that again, I'll......I'll....I'll.......aaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhh !!!!!!!!!!

The train driver, although one of the gang hit him on the head, (not Biggs), died several years later from Leukaemia. Biggs could hardly be blamed for that. Nothing really adds up in this refusal when one of the Kray twins was released when he was very ill, and he had done far worse than Biggs ever did. The sentencing in this country is all out of proportion to the crime, especially when 3 years is deemed sufficient for the death of a child. I despair.
it's once again the decision of a politician attempting to curry favour with the electorate and nothing whatsoever to do with justice............not that I'm bothered either way...
Biggs should die in prison.

He refuses to show remorse, and when he should have been serving his sentence he was living the high life in exile and royally taking the p!ss out of us.

Had he served his time when originally sentenced, he'd've been a free man for many years by now.

I couldn't care any less if I tried that he is not a threat and is in poor health - he deserves to die in prison.

All the time he was in good health he was happy to live in exile, yet as soon as he became ill, he wanted to come 'home' to suckle from our teats.

The man is scum.
I totally agree with flip flop there :-)
-- answer removed --
I think there will always be differences of opinion on any controversial subject, and as each person is entitled to their own opinion and is not likely to change it, or change anyone elses opinion. It turns out to be a rather pointless exercise.

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Ronnie Biggs

Answer Question >>