Boris Makes Freudian Slip

[FatticusInch]

….thanks Putin instead of Zelensky.

https://news.sky.com/story/boris-johnson-thanks-vladimir-putin-for-inspirational-leadership-instead-of-zelenskyy-12703631

What an absolute dork. Unless of course he was having a flashback to being debfiefed by Labedev Snr(again) in a debauched weekend, alone in an Italian castle?

[FatticusInch]

ichkeria
//The Lebedev (if that is who you actually mean) thing is a load of nonsense. Certainly embarrassing, but you are reading far too much into it. Your motive is simply to make cheap politcal points.
Fine. But that is what it is//

So why was it so newsworthy, why did it worry the Security Services and why did he appoint Lebedev against their advice over serious concerns?
Do you understand what national security along with transparency and accountability in government actually mean?
It certainly was embarrassing, especially when before a PSC he claimed(yet again) to have no knowledge of said meeting, until his memory was ‘jogged’ a little.

[ichkeria]

Yes.
But presumably you are joking about "Freudian" slip.

[FatticusInch]

ichkeria
Yes.
//But presumably you are joking about "Freudian" slip.//

(Sigh)……hence the reference to meeting up(minus his Met Police security detail) with a former KGB chief directly after a NATO summit where they’d just been discussing, yes, you guessed it…… Vladimir Putin and the Salisbury poisoning.

If I have to explain the irony it’s obviously lost on you.

[Peter Pedant]

Freud as wish fulfillment
and not sex

or to be exact
Freud's most well-known theory, wish fulfillment, is the idea that when wishes can't or won't be fulfilled in our waking lives, they are carried out in dreams. Even anxious or punishing dreams have their roots in wish fulfillment, according to Freud.

oh it has to be dreams
My dear late papa explained to us adolescents that walking down a corridor and trying to pass a woman but doing a waltz instead, was in Freudian terms a wish to have sex with her.... ( 1965)

Oh I am not being pedantic am I?
Perhaps I should have prefaced: Fr. Jack look a like explains....

[Peter Pedant]

do we know what Boris said about Salisbury?
he wd be a fool to say - " Cripes poison whom you like, and we will call you Messalina or Lucrezia "

yeah and Lebedev: St Nicholas, if dat stupid babouchka with nerve gas training hadnt passed, zen no-one woot noe.....

[FatticusInch]

In case anyone hasn’t seen it.



Who actually ties his shoelaces for him?

[gulliver1]

FCI @ 21.18 LOL. ....Boris is ..."Moronic"

[FatticusInch]

I see Naomi24 beat a hasty retreat after being reminded of the awkward truth again?
Oh well……

[naomi24]

Pardon?

[FatticusInch]

The reply at 11.24 after your ‘if he wasn’t the person he was’ post.
You obviously needed reminding of his character and reputation.

[naomi24]

There’s nothing to say. I disagree with you and you boring everyone to death with your incessant repetitive bleating won’t change that.

[Peter Pedant]

boring everyone to death with my incessant repetitive bleating won’t change that.

oh Naomi you are being unfair to yourself - we would miss your constant bleating ( if it werent there)

[Peter Pedant]

has mega poss-up with lebedev
and the put him up for the Lords and sticks with it

bit stinky - BUT wilson and gannex mac...

[FatticusInch]

naomi24
//There’s nothing to say. I disagree with you and you boring everyone to death with your incessant repetitive bleating won’t change that.//

Of course you do because I’ve stated undeniable facts.

[naomi24]

I disagree with you.

[FatticusInch]

You’re so often a stranger to the truth when it comes to Boris though.
Poor you.

[naomi24]

Save your sympathy for yourself, fatticusinch. With a bit of luck you’ll grow up one of these days.

[FatticusInch]

Lol, it’s not sympathy, it’s pity.

[ichkeria]

Fatticus it’s at best ironic that Johnson made that slip.
That is all it is.
Laugh at him and move on
If you are serious that he’s some sort of accomplice to the Kremlin then you are making yourself look ridiculous

[FatticusInch]

Ironic indeed.
But the more he faces questions about his actions and movements at that time, the appointment of a peer despite Security Service advice(that he refused to publish) combined with wealthy Russian donors making large contributions to his party for tennis matches and meeting up with a former KGB chief looks rather iffy to say the least, hence he was questioned by a PSC about it and exacerbated the situation as he gave vague, forgetful answers.

People have been forced to resign in disgrace for far less.

Take a look at his character and demeanour that I listed on the previous page, then attempt to reason why it looks decidedly dodgy to anyone of an inquisitive nature.

Do try to understand why evasion over meeting up with said persons and intrigue surrounding such events goes against all parliamentary procedures and guidelines at that time, then ask yourself why one journalist deemed it his ‘defining scandal’, it’s all in the links for you.