ChatterBank1 min ago
A Party Too Far ?
Boris Johnsons ambition was to make his name remembered in History.
He has certainly achieved That.
Boris Johnson is the first serving Prime Minister in history to have broken the Law. He and his Con Party thought they were above the Law.
It is time for him and his Cons to go . he has taken the Pee far too long .
....Get Rid ..
He has certainly achieved That.
Boris Johnson is the first serving Prime Minister in history to have broken the Law. He and his Con Party thought they were above the Law.
It is time for him and his Cons to go . he has taken the Pee far too long .
....Get Rid ..
Answers
> over 8000 were fined, why is the PM any different 1) those 8000 didn't set the rules 2) those 8000 didn't lie to Parliament about it 3) telling the truth to Parliament is not a requirement of their jobs
20:58 Tue 12th Apr 2022
"It was actually within the rules anyway."
If that were the case, why did the Met believe otherwise and why have all three of those named yesterday, paid the penalties rather than challenge them?
Have you had sight of all the evidence produced in connexion with each of those individuals relating to that particular incident?
If yes, please enlighten us.
If that were the case, why did the Met believe otherwise and why have all three of those named yesterday, paid the penalties rather than challenge them?
Have you had sight of all the evidence produced in connexion with each of those individuals relating to that particular incident?
If yes, please enlighten us.
Owning Street and Whitehall are plastered full of CCTV, swipe card passes and message and email data.
The 100 individuals were sent questionnaires because there was sufficient evidence of rule breaking. The questionaries were merely a courtesy to let them give their version of events. Ignoring them would not have avoided fines.
The 100 individuals were sent questionnaires because there was sufficient evidence of rule breaking. The questionaries were merely a courtesy to let them give their version of events. Ignoring them would not have avoided fines.
I wonder if plod "officially" made them aware of their rights and that the "questionnaire" would be used in evidence against them. Was the required reading of rights signed off at the met and recorded? If not was the whole procedure a miscarriage of justice? Perhaps they could get one of those "you man rites" briefs to represent them. Starmer hasn't got much on at the moment, perhaps he fancies the gig. He used to be quite keen on that sort of stuff, or was he only concerned when the "victims" were communists or illegal immigrants and such.
There is a far more serious side to this. There are little lies and big lies, never the less they are lies.
Other countries will never take Boris seriously again, that's if they ever did before. The problem is now Boris will never be able to brand another country to be devious or have a playbook.
His branding of Putin is now a very sticky wicket.
Once a liar always a liar I'm afraid.
Other countries will never take Boris seriously again, that's if they ever did before. The problem is now Boris will never be able to brand another country to be devious or have a playbook.
His branding of Putin is now a very sticky wicket.
Once a liar always a liar I'm afraid.
//There are little lies and big lies, never the less they are lies.//
I see what TTT, quite correctly, has been pointed out was a whoosh moment for you.
And I doubt World leaders give a monkeys about Johnsons so called party's. They have far bigger things to worry about.
And anyhow there are much bigger things Johnson needs to answer for, like where and who did all the brass for track and trace and furlough etc go.
Then there is the ridiculous green policies that are putting sections of the community into poverty.
Those are the things we should be holding him to account for and demanding he go.
I see what TTT, quite correctly, has been pointed out was a whoosh moment for you.
And I doubt World leaders give a monkeys about Johnsons so called party's. They have far bigger things to worry about.
And anyhow there are much bigger things Johnson needs to answer for, like where and who did all the brass for track and trace and furlough etc go.
Then there is the ridiculous green policies that are putting sections of the community into poverty.
Those are the things we should be holding him to account for and demanding he go.
'I wonder if plod "officially" made them aware of their rights and that the "questionnaire" would be used in evidence against them.'
The letter included the following declaration,
"I make this declaration of my own free will. I understand that I do not have to say anything but that if I do it may harm my defence if I do not mention when questioned something which I later rely on in court. This statement may be given in evidence."
The letter included the following declaration,
"I make this declaration of my own free will. I understand that I do not have to say anything but that if I do it may harm my defence if I do not mention when questioned something which I later rely on in court. This statement may be given in evidence."
We will all have egg on our faces if Boris don't go. Because when Putin views a leader being a soggy rag that's when he takes advantage.
That's why I say in an above post its far more serious on the world stage, and if you think ( like someone's already said) that other countries couldn't care less, you would be wrong.
They won't do deals of any kind with a known liar.
That's why I say in an above post its far more serious on the world stage, and if you think ( like someone's already said) that other countries couldn't care less, you would be wrong.
They won't do deals of any kind with a known liar.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank6 mins ago
ChatterBank9 mins ago
Wheelchair/Disability Friendly Holiday...
Travel10 mins ago
