News2 mins ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Ok, these people then.
Giuffre named several others that she claims Epstein and Maxwell instructed her to have sex with, including hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin, attorney Alan Dershowitz, politician Bill Richardson, the late MIT scientist Marvin Minsky, lawyer George J. Mitchell, and MC2 modelling agent Jean-Luc Brunel.[28][29]
Giuffre named several others that she claims Epstein and Maxwell instructed her to have sex with, including hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin, attorney Alan Dershowitz, politician Bill Richardson, the late MIT scientist Marvin Minsky, lawyer George J. Mitchell, and MC2 modelling agent Jean-Luc Brunel.[28][29]
tomus42
Whatever she says about Andrew, he isn't going anywhere near a jail, although it might get a few years off her sentence.
An interesting one indeed
I do wonder what compelled her to ‘take the fifth’ triggering potentially catastrophic repercussions for her ?
This story has still got plenty of legs and skeletons to boot
Whatever she says about Andrew, he isn't going anywhere near a jail, although it might get a few years off her sentence.
An interesting one indeed
I do wonder what compelled her to ‘take the fifth’ triggering potentially catastrophic repercussions for her ?
This story has still got plenty of legs and skeletons to boot
I understand pleading Not Guilty, that puts the burden of evidence and proof on the Prosecution side, that's simple common sense.
But I get the impression that Ms Maxwell suffers the same attitude as Epstein and Prince Andrew - that a life of wealth and privilege at that level for that long develops a level of perceived invincibility, a genuine perception that normal morality and codes of conduct, and the law, simply do not apply to them.
But hubris is always waiting. They don't see it, but it's there, waiting.
But I get the impression that Ms Maxwell suffers the same attitude as Epstein and Prince Andrew - that a life of wealth and privilege at that level for that long develops a level of perceived invincibility, a genuine perception that normal morality and codes of conduct, and the law, simply do not apply to them.
But hubris is always waiting. They don't see it, but it's there, waiting.
//Sadly for her, it didn't reduce them enough ...//
No, but clearly it came close given the amount of time the jury were out.
Still, guilty now so off to jail she goes.
As for Andrew's case being a civil case I doubt it affects it one way or another. After all Epstein was a proven kiddyfiddler from years ago.
No, but clearly it came close given the amount of time the jury were out.
Still, guilty now so off to jail she goes.
As for Andrew's case being a civil case I doubt it affects it one way or another. After all Epstein was a proven kiddyfiddler from years ago.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.