Donate SIGN UP

Yep It's Another Belter From The Parole Board!

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 13:47 Tue 11th Jun 2019 | News
65 Answers
https://news.sky.com/story/man-dubbed-monster-of-worcester-after-killing-three-children-is-freed-11739630
Who are these people? Who can possibly conclude that this savage should ever see the daylight again?
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 65rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
AG

"Which judges have done in a few cases. The judge in this case did not see this as one of them."

Yes we know that ag, but this thread is all about the role of the Parole board and not the sentencing by the judge.

do we need a Parole board?...YES under our present system and yes, we would all avoid being placed in the situation that the parole board finds themselves......a thankless task.

I really can't see where this thread is going.
//why take a chance? //

Why are there so few full life tariffs handed down Sqad? There have been any amount of serious murders.
This with the last part especially ..... But a document about his case claimed he had changed "considerably" over his 45 years in custody and that he had developed "self-control" - as well as "considerable understanding of the problems that he has had and what caused them".... says in effect he was a victim of past experience
ag...I cannot answer that question, unless the Law has degrees of murder with varying sentences.....which it obviously has.
The bottom line is....if the Parole board is correct, then no harm will be done, but if they are wrong, then further innocent people may die.
Sqad at 16.05 - correct.
LOL ^^^....;-)
In my opinion, he should NEVER see daylight again - he's a monster.
This is interesting, notably the last para.

//How the Parole Board decides which inmates are safe to be released

The Parole Board assesses whether serving prisoners in England and Wales are safe to be released into the community or moved to open conditions, considering around 25,000 cases a year.

The organisation came under intense scrutiny following the original decision to release black cab rapist John Worboys decision earlier this year - which was then overturned last month.

After complaints that parole processes were shrouded in secrecy, ministers scrapped a rule banning the Board from disclosing information about the reasoning behind its panels’ findings.

So far, more than 1,400 requests for decision summaries have been lodged. \\

Unless I've missed it, he's not having his identity protected as has been done for other murderers.
Hmmmm!

Ladybirder, interesting.

The Parole Board certainly have a high caseload seemingly.

Not surprising to note the complaints of a lack of transparency in terms of decision making.
Good to see a move in the right direction AG.
;-)
There is another thread where a woman drowned her 23 months old twins and she is said to be mentally unstable. It's now not murder but manslaughter. I wonder if that man had done the same thing today to those three children would he too have been called mentally ill?.
Andres, you can't make a comparison between these cases.

In the female's case, it was accepted by her husband and Prosecution that she was mentally incapacitated.

In this case he would have had to have his case supported and accepted by professionals if he had claimed diminished responsibility.
Just wondering because so many cases these days seem to put forward the mental health aspect of the murderer. There never seemed to be so many 50 years ago.
I don't think he should be let out. There is no excuse for what he did.
Andres, I'm not sure in law when certain defences were enacted.

However, if a Defendant considers that making a plea is a way out of a serious crime then they are kidding themselves.

Mental Health issues are not to be dismissed lightly but experts in their field will put together extensive reports to guide proceedings.

*bogus plea*
Someone who committed such crimes should have been strung up.

Since the liberal hand wringers won't allow that then these people should be locked up for life, no release ever for whatever reasons.

The Parole board should never get to look at such cases.

He took 3 innocent childrens lifes and then strung their bodies on the railings. Utter scum, and I dont get why some thing he should be out and have sympathy for him. Are the three children going to be resurrected? No they are not.
Apologies for the rant. This sort of thing where kids have been involved makes my blood boil.

41 to 60 of 65rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Yep It's Another Belter From The Parole Board!

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.