News2 mins ago
Sir Cliff Richard Wins Case Against Bbc
Sir Cliff Richard has won his High Court privacy case against the BBC over its coverage of a police raid on his home.
Judge Mr Justice Mann said the singer will receive "substantial damages".
https:/
Good for him!!
Judge Mr Justice Mann said the singer will receive "substantial damages".
https:/
Good for him!!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I'm happy at the outcome of this.
Naturally, the 'substantial damages' will come out of Central Funds rather than the pockets of the executives responsible. It may be too much to hope that those same executives are carpeted for this stunt but I'd like to think it would give similar pause for thought in the future...
Naturally, the 'substantial damages' will come out of Central Funds rather than the pockets of the executives responsible. It may be too much to hope that those same executives are carpeted for this stunt but I'd like to think it would give similar pause for thought in the future...
>>>I just can't bring myself to feel sorry for him.
Up until now he is innocent.
He has never been charged with anything.
How would you like it if loads of police arrived at your house, took you away in handcuffs, and then searched your house for the next few days?
Even if you did not get charged with anything can you imagine the neighbours gossip and accusations.
It wold be bad enough for a private individual let alone for such a famous person.
I think the behaviour of the BBC and the Police was disgraceful and he deserves everything he gets.
Up until now he is innocent.
He has never been charged with anything.
How would you like it if loads of police arrived at your house, took you away in handcuffs, and then searched your house for the next few days?
Even if you did not get charged with anything can you imagine the neighbours gossip and accusations.
It wold be bad enough for a private individual let alone for such a famous person.
I think the behaviour of the BBC and the Police was disgraceful and he deserves everything he gets.
I remember in 2003 the actor Matthew Kelly was arrested after some accusations.
He was actually appearing in a pantomime as Captain Hook at the time and he was arrested as he came off stage.
Charges were never brought.
But why on earth did the police have to go an arrest him just as he came off stage?
Surely a famous person like that could have had a "low key" arrest and questioning.
Sometime the police behave in such a heavy handed way.
Even though he was never charged there is still details about his arrest on the internet, so casting doubts on his name and reputation after all this time.
Article from 2003 Daily Telegraph below still on the internet.
https:/
He was actually appearing in a pantomime as Captain Hook at the time and he was arrested as he came off stage.
Charges were never brought.
But why on earth did the police have to go an arrest him just as he came off stage?
Surely a famous person like that could have had a "low key" arrest and questioning.
Sometime the police behave in such a heavy handed way.
Even though he was never charged there is still details about his arrest on the internet, so casting doubts on his name and reputation after all this time.
Article from 2003 Daily Telegraph below still on the internet.
https:/
Latest Posts
Spectator 2653 Last 2 Help Needed
Crosswords3 mins ago
Spam & Scams4 mins ago
Body & Soul4 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.