Donate SIGN UP

Trump's Mental Health And Why People Are Discussing It

Avatar Image
mikey4444 | 09:48 Sat 06th Jan 2018 | News
106 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42580762

I heard the live interview with the author of this book on "Today" this morning, and Michael Wolff made a good defence of his legations.

Even if only half of them are true, then the Trump situation is worse than we thought.
Gravatar

Answers

81 to 100 of 106rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Avatar Image
Trump's behaviour has been cited as a subject of concern by over 100 professional psychiatrists. It's not hard to spot. The constant backstabbing, vitriol, lying, over reactions. Plus the huge number of accounts by ex-staffers (very few stay long) describing his deranged behaviour... he blatantly is not well. As for "policies" (as if he ever had any...
10:28 Sat 06th Jan 2018
He's such a pleb!

Webbo - nonsense. I've yet to see or hear anyone back Diane Abbot.
Haha Peter, henceforth he will be know as the Marques of Quemnsberry. :))
ummmm

\\He's such a pleb!

Webbo - nonsense. I've yet to see or hear anyone back Diane Abbot.//

her party and plenty of liebour supporters.
Webbo,
// Diane Abbott mental illness and the lefties keep quiet //

Diabetes is not a mental illness. And Abbott was/is much ridiculed (not entirely undeserved).
Diane Abbott actually was ill. I thought the great defence of the Trumpites was that this is all a horrible slur by the commies.
And that he is not, in fact, ill.
Khandro
Th Washington Examiner (which you tried to hide the source of) is owned by a wealthy Repblican, Philip Anschutz, who donation $1 million to Trump’s election campaign.
Not exactly an unbiased report then.
There's an old Soviet joke that seems pertinent here.

A man runs onto Red Square shouting, "Brezhnev is an idiot! A moron!"

The police quickly descend, and he is soon sentenced to 10 years in jail.

Why 10? 1 for insulting the leader of the party, 9 for betraying a state secret.
gromit; //Th Washington Examiner (which you tried to hide the source of) is owned by a wealthy Repblican, Philip Anschutz, who donation $1 million to Trump’s election campaign.
Not exactly an unbiased report then.//

This is your usual pathetic tactic of instead of refuting the facts as listed, you attack the source itself.
You really must try harder to engage in content or I'm afraid a 'fail' is staring you in the face.
Have you had a chat with your mate Morrissey about it, Khandro?
// Haha Peter, henceforth he will be know as the Marques of Quemnsberry. :))//

spelling doesnt seems to have been his metier - awful bit of work - he cdnt bear it when his son cd sit in the Lords by right and HE had to be elected as a scottish representative peer.

As for Trump - the operative chosen to state that Trump was the sanest man in the white house - really didnt seem to have his heart in it. Shifty eyed performance if ever I saw one
// you attack the source itself. You really must try harder to engage in content //

so it is OK to establish the russians interfered in the election so long as no one knows what they did ?

interesting idea
In response to the reasonable point "you attack the source itself. You really must try harder to engage in content" we get this:

// you attack the source itself. You really must try harder to engage in content //

Can someone please explain the point being made here please?

PS: be as patronising as you like, but I'm asking for an explanation, not a sneer.
Not the first, and not the last of a VE garbled post.

The response I'm questioning is:

"so it is OK to establish the russians interfered in the election so long as no one knows what they did ?"
Khandro,
// Creation of 1.7 million new jobs //

True, but that is 300,000 short of the jobs created in 2016. Obama added over 2 million jobs a year in 2014, 2015 and 2016, so job creation has actually slowed under Trump.
^Don't believe that. Haven't even heard the anti-Trump morons on CNN, etc, trying to attack him on job creation.
Anyhow, how come AB's left wing, ahem, intelligentsia were telling us not to believe anything in this book on Thursday;
https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1587898.html
yet by Saturday it's factual evidence of further Trump failings?
Zacs //Have you had a chat with your mate Morrissey about it, Khandro?//
You mean the man that got it right about no-go zones in Europe, when you got it wrong? No.
Erm, no. I mean the bloke who, like you and your propagandist right wing news source, made it up and were proven wrong.
Zacs; //like you and your propagandist right wing news source, made it up and were proven wrong.//
I wouldn't recommend any female members of your family in normal attire to take a stroll around the Paris suburb, Seine-Saint-Denis at night.
Khandro, there have always been Ghettos in every major city. It’s nothing new. Claiming that they have anything to do with recent immigration (legal or illegal) is fake news. Claiming that they mete out Sharia law is plain daft.

81 to 100 of 106rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Trump's Mental Health And Why People Are Discussing It

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.