Donate SIGN UP

We Are Such A Soft Touch, Why This Women Is Still Allowed To Hold A British Passport, Even If She Would Become Stateless Is Beyond Me?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 11:43 Sun 24th Dec 2017 | News
41 Answers
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Merry Christmas AOG - my your heart be filled with peace and joy.
It's a funny old world right enough.

Maybe she'll have a nasty fall or something.
madness.
Madness indeed . she choose to leave,
*** chose .
// Born in 1990, the woman acquired British nationality because her Bangladeshi father was present and settled in the United Kingdom. //

She has British nationality because she was born in the UK. The Government cannot take anyones nationality away from them. Even traitors retain their nationality.
The right of British nationals to travel abroad can be curtailed by revoking their passport, but that is to stop them leaving, not to stop them returning.
Home Secretaries have an habit of going bonkers and assuming powers that they do not have. Blunkett did it, and May did it, and it is the job of the Judiciary to slap them downlike they have just done to Rudd.
what would we do without your explanations Gromit.

We must be a laughing Stock.

Good the see the Anti-Brit losing none of his vitriol before Christmas.
As much as it might not be agreeable to some people, the law is the law and judges must abide by it.
AOG, before you pose any more ignorant questions, I’d suggest you read and absorb this. Might prevent another of your uneducated rants:
https://www.gov.uk/types-of-british-nationality/british-subject

You’ll note that it is your inalienable right as a British subject to hold a passport and it cannot be revoked it if it means said subject becomes stateless:
http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06820/SN06820.pdf
If her action is treasonable she could be jailed
I don't see why a country can't renounce one's citizenship under appropriate circumstances. Not simply on whim of course, situations that call for it should be defined. Folk have been sent into exile in the past. We wash our hands of them, they go find somewhere that'll have them.
//. We wash our hands of them, they go find somewhere that'll have them.// Not if they are British.
Well they wouldn't be if the law allowed us to renounce their citizenship; so that wouldn't be an issue.
But the law only allows that in certain circumstances, which did not apply to this woman.
What the law is now is irrelevant to my statement. It's about what the law should be.
OG, In January 2014, the Immigration Bill 2013–14 was introduced to extend the powers of the Home Secretary to declare certain terrorism suspects stateless. As this has been through the courts, I suspect there are no grounds to do this to G3.
OG, what the law should be is just your opinion.
Of course it's my opinion. I'm not planning on stating someone else's here. I invite others to agree with me.

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

We Are Such A Soft Touch, Why This Women Is Still Allowed To Hold A British Passport, Even If She Would Become Stateless Is Beyond Me?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.