The gist of Ms Fransen's speech (in which race is never mentioned) is that Islam is an ideology which enjoins all of its followers to struggle (jihad) in order to establish its dominance over non-Muslims. Conclusion: more Muslims and more mosques is bad news for the rest of us. Nobody who's been to Specsavers - or doesn't need glasses - should find that contentious, should they?
I guess the bit which amounts to "hate crime" or whatever she's being charged with is when she spoils an otherwise good point by saying that there are no[i moderate Muslims and that they are [i]all] out to get us. (A pity - with a bit more subtlety she could have invoked Godwin's Law by pointing out that it was the 30% believers in a different struggle - Kampf - who were relevant in the 1930s, not the 70% "moderate" Germans.)
Of course, if it's demonisation and incitement to hatred you're looking for you could go into the majority of mosques in Britain, listen to the sermons, read the materials and see what the imams and the literature (both often Saudi or Qatari provided) are saying about us. Or the Home Office could look more closely at the dozens of radical preachers who are invited into this country every year to tour Britain's mosques and Islamic societies.
But, as Ms Fransen points out in her speech, this isn't going to happen any time soon. The appalling truth about Islam and a large number of its followers has already been exposed by the C4 Undercover Mosque documentaries about ten years ago, and by the BBC earlier than that I think. Result: Muslim groups scream and shout, everybody backs down, business as usual.