Donate SIGN UP

Theresa May Does 'not Agree' With Us Ban On Refugees

Avatar Image
mikey4444 | 09:39 Sun 29th Jan 2017 | News
81 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38786576

"Prime Minister Theresa May does "not agree" with Donald Trump's refugee ban and will appeal to the US if it affects British citizens, Downing Street says"

She has vowed to step in if any British citizens are involved, and not before time. I guess the honeymoon is over Teresa !
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 81rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I'm looking forward to seeing just how far you'll go, ymb, in making excuses for Trump. His policy is awful because it's awful -- not because of some left-wing sabotage.
1) /We disagreed/ No, you disagreed a lot of people do agree. Are you related to Lilly Allen or something?
2) It is a temporary ban until better background checks can be made.
3) How dare you refer to me as small minded because I dont kow-tow to you liberal elitist views. What I think about you is not printable.
His policy to stop terrorists is awful eh? Right oh.
Awww, gawd. So it's now leftist infiltrators miss using Trump's EO for their own ends? Unbelievable. Don't you work for an American bank? Why don't you ask around tomorrow and see whether there are any people from the banned countries, and ask them how they feel?
-- Fine, then I speak for myself -- but if you are going to brand everyone liberal as thinking together it seems odd that when one of them speaks you suddenly hold it to be their own individual perspective.

As to the last, I talked about "this obsession". Not yours specifically. And it *is* small-minded. But I separate the opinion from the people who hold it.
Don't you get it yet, the World is waking up. Your views are not the majority they never have been but anyone who has not agreed with you has been shouted down and accused of being a racist or some sort of phobe, swivel eyed loony all sorts of names.
Woo, straw man much?

A policy to stop terrorists is hardly awful in and of itself, and may be well-intentioned. But sledgehammers and nuts come to mind. This is, so far, catching exactly no terrorists and exactly everybody else. So it's not a "policy to stop terrorists". It's just badly-implemented, badly-thought out, paranoid crap.
"Your views are not the majority..."

More people voted for Clinton than they did for Trump. Just saying.

But then it hardly matters. I never held that my view was a majority. Equally, if you are under the impression that everyone who voted for Trump agreed with him then, perhaps, you ought to think again.
ZM, you know as well as I do that things can be implemented in different ways depending on interpretation. I was careful not to say it was but say it could be be and with all the Anti Trump hatred it is perfectly possible.

Why should I ask people from those Countries, not that there are any they are all Indian and India tends to hate Muslim countries so I doubt I will get far there.

Even so, it is up to the host Nation who they accept, perhaps if thesecountries rid themselves of terrorists then they would not have the problem?
mikey; //.there 1000's of people trapped in transit,//

Where did you hear that? The BBC say 1 to 2 hundred, and that may be an exaggeration. It's never straight forward to enter the USA, I've stood in lines for hours, even having all the right paperwork. Anyone who believes that you can simply travel around the world and go anywhere without any hindrance had better not venture beyond Margate.
Try going to China.
//A policy to stop terrorists is hardly awful //

Really?

I give up.
You have your moment YMB......Must be heaven for you at the moment, having a world leader who represents the little downtrodden man. But enjoy it while it lasts, cos it won't last long. I note you haven't answered my question about why a federal judge has overturned part of the order already.
His EO was illegal, what's so difficult to understand ?
Only part of it Anne (so far). America will be waking up soon. Let's see what today brings. I don't think Donald will be having Sunday lunch in the Hampshires.
Be interesting how he's going to front this out. ?
It is a pity that our leaders don't follow Trump's lead, yet we continue to invite into our country such a diverse religion as Islam.

This in the future could cause many more problems in our own country than we have already experienced, especially when the various factions of this problematic religion confront each other here.

What I can never understand is the fact that those Muslims who are fleeing similar problems in their own countries choose to come to the West, but don't also don't choose to leave their Islamic faith behind?

Obviously what must attract them to the West is because these countries are specifically Christian, which even if one is not particular religious, one must admit, it has made our countries more safe and peaceful than Islam has made their countries.
Hope Trump has good security, accidents can happen.
AOG, have you read any papers this morning or watched the news? Do you still want our leaders to be like Trump?
I don't agree with Trump but hasn't he just taken Obama's actions a step further?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-35128684
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/02/18/dhs-announces-further-travel-restrictions-visa-waiver-program

Where was the AB outrage over this ... has anyone got a link to the thread?
-- answer removed --

21 to 40 of 81rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Theresa May Does 'not Agree' With Us Ban On Refugees

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.