Donate SIGN UP

Fatal Accident On Train

Avatar Image
hc4361 | 23:22 Sun 07th Aug 2016 | News
69 Answers
Today a train passenger has died because he stuck his head out of the window and was struck by an oncoming train. A shocking tragedy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3728301/Horror-person-decapitated-speeding-train-sticking-head-window.html

As a child I was warned about this but didn't really believe it would ever happen. However, it was enough to make sure I never do so when the train is moving.

This accident was obviously preventable by restricting the opening of the window. Many hotels and high rise buildings already do this to prevent 'jumpers' and inquisitive children coming to harm. My question is - should train companies make sure train windows can't open more than a few inches?
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 69rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by hc4361. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
We still have a man with no head ladies......... : (
Horrendous, instantaneous for him of course but dreadful for those who both witnessed and had to attend.

Assuming that the human head and neck combined, are between 10 and 16 inches long, how did this accident occur? Surely there is a much greater distance between two trains travelling in opposite directions? At least there ought to be.
The gap between the rails is referred to as the 4 ft although it is over that, the gap between the two tracks would be called the 6 ft, so yes the person would have to lean well out of the window.
He won't do that again, a lesson in common sence.
There is no accounting for idiots.
I'm afraid anyone who does that sort of thing was never destined for a long life.

If it wasn't the train it would have been something else. It is impossible to cater for all stupidity even in today's right-on, offended litigious society.

whilst the daily mail might be given to hyperbole and sensationalist reporting (indeed that's the case here too), I would advise you check out their report, if only for a number of the photos, which are quite clear.

this was an old train (built in the 1980s) and the door in question is in the centre coach, and is where the guard's compartment used to be (these trains are driver only) and for that reason is equipped with a droplight similar to those that were common on most trains with slam doors. in the photos, the attention of the emergency services is on the door on the platform side of the train, which means the victim wasn't struck by a train, rather he came into contact with something lineside (i've had that confirmed). the clearance between trains and (for example) bridges isn't very big, and it wouldn't be necessary to lean very far out to sustain a life ending injury.

the sad fact is that this was completely unnecessary - new trains to replace these old stagers have been available for some time, but the unions have blacked them as part of their dispute with train operator Govia-Thameslink, Gatwick Express's parent.
looks like Natural selection at work.
According to the news he was NOT decapitated but suffered severe fatal head injuries
One might have thought that the designer of the railway would understand the possibility and ensure tracks had sufficient gap between them that two approaching heads could not make contact. But that would require an adequate designer.
um no OG

when the pendolino ( leaning over ) train was introduced it was found going arond corners ( or bends ) it might smack into another counterleaning pendolino
All the more reason to have an adequate gap.
I wonder how many people were killed on this train?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rHde_2Iys8
//One might have thought that the designer of the railway would understand the possibility and ensure tracks had sufficient gap between them that two approaching heads could not make contact. But that would require an adequate designer. //

by the same token, why are there not 6-foot high barriers either sides of every road, and pedestrian crossings whose barriers do not permit persons to enter the road until traffic is guaranteed to be stopped?

after all, the highways authorities must be aware of the possibility that pedestrians will stray into the path of oncoming traffic?
That's taking an extreme. Loads of individuals like the wind in their hair, which is why open top cars are popular. Spacing the rails is simply common sense. Walling in pavements is absurd.
^^^^^ Let me get this right, one man sticks his head and maybe his shoulders out of a train window and is killed by an oncoming train, and you want all tracks moved further apart ? A bit costly.
I want all tracks to have been designed properly and built further apart from the start. That designers do their job properly. No one has suggested moving anything until now.
But now you've suggested it; tracks need replacing from time to time, so correcting the flaw could be done were the will there.

41 to 60 of 69rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Fatal Accident On Train

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.