News1 min ago
Rolf Still Raking It In !
Answers
Doesn't matter, does it? He's not going to be able to spend it.
23:06 Sun 15th Feb 2015
Ummmm, don't get me wrong, I've got every sympathy for the victims of these horrendous crimes but why should they get money from the accused?
If they were financially ruined by the accused then yes but some of these cases date back to 30 years ago so why should they get a payment now?
Surely knowing that the person is locked up for their crimes is suffice
If they were financially ruined by the accused then yes but some of these cases date back to 30 years ago so why should they get a payment now?
Surely knowing that the person is locked up for their crimes is suffice
-- answer removed --
Its immaterial how much someone in prison has anyway. I remember reading years ago in the press, how much Myra Hindley had in her prison account It was accompanied with much indignation . It doesnt make a blind bit of difference because they cant spend it. Every prisoner (immaterial of how much money they have) is only allowed to spend so much per week.
-- answer removed --
Proceeds of Crime Act covers precisely that
You/they apply to a court and it has to be shown the sum payable is from naughty activity.
/That's not strictly true - Hall may be ruined by the compensation claims from his victims, but not from operation yewtree itself. //
Hall would have a defence bill of in excess £100 000 which would be enough to ruin him - didnt someone have to sell their London house to pay for their lawyers
Oh and if you are acquitted - you never get costs in these cases
You/they apply to a court and it has to be shown the sum payable is from naughty activity.
/That's not strictly true - Hall may be ruined by the compensation claims from his victims, but not from operation yewtree itself. //
Hall would have a defence bill of in excess £100 000 which would be enough to ruin him - didnt someone have to sell their London house to pay for their lawyers
Oh and if you are acquitted - you never get costs in these cases
Rolf Harris had a relationship for years with the woman who reported him in the first instance.He should have paid her the money that she asked him for when she wanted to start her animal sanctuary.'Pay up or my brother will go to the police'. Then he probably wouldn't be in prison now. I don't think a person should have to pay twice for their offences (prison and financial rewards)unless the crime involved embezzlement or similar offences.His family still have to survive and his financial investments should be turned over to them.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.