Donate SIGN UP

Congratulations

Avatar Image
friedgreentomato | 18:45 Wed 29th May 2013 | News
168 Answers

Thought I would post some good news after all the sad news over the last week.

http://www.channel4.com/news/gay-marriage-first-gay-couple-wed-in-france
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 168rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by friedgreentomato. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Just been watching this on the news, many congratulations to them, hope they enjoy a long and happy life together, they looked so happy it was uplifting to see.
Congratulations to them. Hope they have a long and happy marriage together :o)

I'm waiting for an invite to my cousins wedding. He had a civil partnership a few years ago and I'm sure he and his partner will go for the wedding soon.
given the speed with which this has progessed in France, why does our government believe it'll take more than a year to undertake the first British marriage following the law being enacted?
Each to their own.............
totally agree Craft. I'm not homophobic and was a guest recently at a gay couples civil ceremony. They were equally happy, no less happy than if they had had a 'marriage'. This has been discussed to death but my opinion is that 'marriage' was designed to unite 2 people of the opposite sex in holy matrimony and should remain so.
Isn't it good news?

Given our proximity to France, we ought to be able to see if and when the sky falls in over there.........
Such good news! So happy for them :-)

It's just a pity they can't enjoy their day properly. All the security and police would surely put a dampener on things.
I know someone had to be first,,,,,,,,,but its not my idea of a special day surrounded by security and protesters,
waste of 2 lookers
They could have had a private wedding with no security or press. It was their choice to tell the world.
What is the legal difference between a civil wedding and a civil partnership? Excluding the sex of the partners.
After a Civil Wedding, you are married.........after a Civil-Partnership, you are in a Civil-partnership.
Gathered that. So why the suggestion of civil partnership for different sex couples?
I agree seb,
Because they feel discriminated against........with CPs only being available for gay-couples.
I believe that there are tax and benefit differences between marriage and civil partnerships in this country.
Why is it big news? Just a wedding wasn’t it?
Nothing unusual was there? Was there?
Just a normal happy couple, weren’t they?
Lot of hot air over nothing, surely?
Imagine all the French kissing though.
Well – I'd rather not. lol
I echo what many have already said. Good for them.

Daisynonna...the differences between CPs and marriages are:

1. Financial rights

Civil partners do not have the same pension rights as married couples. If one civil partner dies, the pension share that the surviving partner receives is often lower and lasts for less time than with married couples.

The reason for this is the pension a surviving partner is entitled to is measured differently depending on whether they have been civil partnered or married.

For civil partners, public sector schemes are dated back to 1988. For private sector schemes, it need only be backdated to the Civil Partnership Act 2004.

But for married couples, a surviving partner is entitled to a pension based on the number of years their spouse paid into the pension fund.

2. 'Separate is not equal'

Advocates for equal marriage speak of the emotional resonance marriage holds. Marriage represents a form of inclusion within society.

It is a way of belonging to a cultural group and buying into values seen as respectable and acceptable.

The language of marriage carries a social weight that civil partnership does not. This is a reason why civil partners often refer to their partnerships as 'marriages', rather than 'partnerships'.

Those who back equal marriage say using a different word indicates that society attaches less importance to civil partnerships.

3. Foreign travel / Living abroad

Travel restrictions apply to civil partners but not married couples.

Countries like Sweden, Argentina and Portugal, where same-sex marriage is legal, do not see civil partnerships as marriage.

This means UK civil partners living abroad do not enjoy the same rights as same-sex married couples in the 11 countries where equal marriage is legal.

In addition, the marriages of foreign gay couples who travel to the UK are not legally viewed as marriages.

4. Forced 'outing'

Official forms such as the UK census require a declaration of marital status.

This often means that civilly partnered people are forced to state their sexuality, ticking a separate box that says 'civil partnership' rather than 'marriage'.

Also in social situations, many gay people feel uncomfortable declaring their sexuality to strangers (think of all the documents we all full in which ask for marital status). With same sex marriage, that ceases to be an issue.

5. Adultery and vows

Unlike marriages, consummation is not a legal requirement of civil partnerships. Neither is adultery recognized as grounds for dissolution. These differences won't be addressed by the new equal marriage legislation as the government does not intend to re-write these areas of law.

There is also no requirement for civil partners to take any vows.

These variations mean that UK marriage law doesn't necessarily cover civil partnership, opening the door for different treatment of gay couples.

6. Gender

Gender is written into the structure of UK marriage law.

This means if a married trans person would like to get a Gender Recognition Certificate as part of living in their preferred gender, they must divorce and reapply for civil partnership.

Separate marriage and civil partnership regulations mean gender and orientation are the deciding factors in what relationships are legally recognized.


Apologies for the hideously long post, but several people on AB have asked what the difference is over the past few weeks - thought it would be useful to get it down.
sir.prize

Thinking that the big deal is that it's a first. Had this been a man and a woman, I would agree with you that it's a fuss about nothing.

But that's not the case.

1 to 20 of 168rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Congratulations

Answer Question >>