Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by EdmundD. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think i'd have to have the chips without chips and save the 50p :-)
LOL........made me smile.
so if you have chips with chips, that's cheaper than 2 portions of chips! Hilarious!
ken You'd save £1.50!
^^^ You might save 50p, Ken, but if you order 'chips without chips' you'll get this, won't you?
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/9a/81/97/9a81975c7262954391b4bf1c760b2e77.jpg

;-)
Chips with chips. And a side portion of chips .
no one has done spam
Buenchico.....lol
TTT; chips; without chips £1.90. With chips £2.40 Difference = 50p
sorry I meant if youo actually wanted 2 portions of chips:
chips with chips £2.40 ie 2 portions of chips
2 portions of Chips without chips = £3.80
I'd like gravy on mine.
Brilliant, thanks for the laugh!
Jack Nicholson in "Five Easy Pieces"

I'd like a side order of toast.
We don't do toast. I can do you a toasted chicken and lettuce sandwich.
Ok. One toasted chicken and lettuce sandwich........ hold the lettuce.
Yes
also.... hold the chicken
Yes, but that just leaves the toast.
YES
I once asked for a full English breakfast without beans and was told
"Sorry,we don't have any beans, will you have it without tomatoes?"
There was always fights goin on in me local chippy.

Something to do with everyone askin for scraps! Haaaa!
^
Bet there were a few battered fish, too, ag.
;-)
Reminds me of my sister in law once. she ordered scrambled eggs for breakfast in a hotel. A member of staff came out the kitchen and said to her we are very sorry madam but we cant serve you scrambled eggs today, the machines broken.
She replied havent you heard of a fork???

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Chips With Chips Or No Chips?

Answer Question >>