Reassuringly Expensive........

ToraToraTora | 09:32 Fri 10th Jun 2022 | Motoring

42 Answers

Just filled up the Jaaaag, was on empty, £129!

New Honda Jazz

Ford Fiesta 1,4 2006

Answers

1 to 20 of 42

1 2 3 Next Last

Ellipsis

Best Answer

Lovely car, TTT ...

12:22 Fri 10th Jun 2022

Go To Best Answer

Togo

I do hope that you weren't putting that E10 rubbish in the tank. 99 octane only. Better performace, quieter running, more mileage, and no engine damage.

sandyRoe

This motoring business seems to be getting too expensive for the common folk.
Do you think that's a good thing,?

davebro

T3 does and has said so several times

ToraToraTora

Question Author

I only use the 99 octane stuff togs. It actually works out cheaper because I get more MPG.

ToraToraTora

Question Author

sandy: "This motoring business seems to be getting too expensive for the common folk.
Do you think that's a good thing,? " - Yes I do. You'll be ok though Sandy with £500k in your bin!

Redhelen72

Cost me £106 and the husband £109

Hopkirk

I thought for a moment you were putting Stella Artois in.

gulliver1

£129 to charge your electric scooter .
Think you've heen done old china.

aelmpvw

cost me more to fill the car up than it did to buy my first car :-)

ToraToraTora

Question Author

yep, my first car was £30! Ford Anglebox! Wish I had it now!

Togo

//I only use the 99 octane stuff togs. It actually works out cheaper because I get more MPG//

Same here TTT. I have done the comparisons and found that it is cheaper in the long run(pun intended). Better mileage, better performance, and much quieter running. I prefer Shell 99 octane, but will suffer a top up of 97 octane if I am out of range.

barry1010

Is it really a Jag, or a Tata?

ToraToraTora

Question Author

mine is from 2004 when it was owned by Ford. You can tell it's designed for the US by certain features, eg the bonnet pull is on the passenger side, which in the US would be the drivers side.

ToraToraTora

Question Author

here she is: https://ibb.co/my9zgMv