I recall discussion with you before, PeelerPal. In particular I recall your confusion between “legislation” and “law”. I also recall your suggestion that legislation is only enforceable by consent (i.e. you have to agree before you can be prosecuted). I won’t argue too much because most of what you say is absolute drivel. Your “passion” for the law obviously does not extend to practical knowledge but is steeped in idealogical claptrap. However, since you are not so clued up as you’d like us to believe a few points of clarification may be helpful in relation to this question:
“…it is an unlawful warrant as a third party is not allowed to interlope during a civil dispute and the warrant will not be wet ink signed by a magistrate making it unlawful”
Magistrates do not issue warrants (“wet ink” signed or otherwise) for bailiffs to execute in civil proceedings. In fact Magistrates do not get involved in civil proceedings at all apart from family matters.
“…finally, PROPERTY is owned by claim and the owner of the property can simply make a lawful claim of right to that property and then it cannot be removed.”
Incorrect. Property is owned by title. A non-owner cannot simply “lay claim” to property to prevent its removal by bailiffs or High Court Enforcement Officers.
“…but they [sheriffs] cannot act against the human being as remove property (Halisbury Law)”
Incorrect (I’ll let you look it up)
Just a point of clarification about a remark made by jackdaw:
“Sorry, but speeding IS a crime and you can go to prison for it.”
Speeding is indeed a crime (and can be prosecuted with or without consent). But you cannot go to prison for it no matter how fast you go and how often you do it. Maximum penalty is a fine of £1,000 (£2,500 if on a motorway).
“High Court Enforcement Agents can force entry and don't have to be invited in.”
Only in commercial premises. They cannot force entry to residential property but may enter uninvited through an open or unlocked door.
Indeed many people don’t know the law. But PeelerPal needs to keep taking the tablets because some of his “advice” verges on the criminal.