Just For Fun

[kuiperbelt]

https://ibb.co/m9gBqc9

[rowanwitch]

You have a strange idea of what is fun..... Wait until you try sex it will blow your ears off! If course if that really happened you were doing it wrong...

[bobbinwales]

(13+5)x7 divide 1? 126?

[bobbinwales]

forget that...

[bobbinwales]

13x(5+7)/1=155?

[bobbinwales]

or 156 even!!

[bhg481]

(5+1) x 7 x 13 = 6x7x13 =546

[bobbinwales]

oh, thought we could only use x once??

[bhg481]

bobb - you're right. I was treating it like "Countdown".

[Old_Geezer]

456 ?

[bhg481]

Suppose we write it as 13(5+1) x 7 = 13 x 6 x7 =546

[THECORBYLOON]

The question states "can use..." so it's not clear to me whether all the available operations must be used or no.

[ZebuSanctuary]

13(5 + 7)
----------
1

= 156

[ZebuSanctuary]

>10.03

With just 4 number values and 5 operators you'll be hard pushed to formulate an expression.

[Old_Geezer]

Can doesn't mean must.

[Old_Geezer]

Nice one bhg.

[bobbinwales]

Well there ate two many operations to be able to use them all.as for bhg's post if your allowed to omit x sign before a bracket you could do
13(5×7+1)

[bobbinwales]

That's less than bhg's though....ignore me

[ToraToraTora]

(13x(5+7)/1)! = 4.789143e+273 - can we use factorial?

[drmorgans]

Is that the title of the new Ed Sheeran, "!"

[ToraToraTora]

well it didn't say you cannot use !