Donate SIGN UP

Attorney General's Permission

Avatar Image
Peter Pedant | 00:51 Sun 12th Jan 2014 | Law
3 Answers
At Mold a recent case was halted because the attorney general's permission to prosecute had not been sought: R v Wm O'Brien and others
http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/alleged-conspiracy-supply-cannabis-trial-6483634

Any idea, anyone, when it is required and when it is not ?

and a wasted costs order .... how does that differ from costs alone ?

Thanks
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Peter Pedant. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Odd. The key fact is that the conspiracy was to supply in Scotland, that is within a different jurisdiction to that of England and Wales.Without the A-G's fiat the trial could only be in Scotland.

There are quite a number of offences that require such consent before proceedings are instituted. Archbold does not give a list but notes when it is required for individual offences instead. It is certainly required for offences under the Terrorism Act 2000 and the Explosive Substances Act 1883.

The A-G can also take over and stop prosecutions, a power generally used when someone has brought a private prosecution of no merit, issuing what is called a 'nolly' by practitioners but is properly a 'nolle prosequi' .
Waste costs are costs thrown away in the proceedings, to be considered when costs are finally calculated.

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Attorney General's Permission

Answer Question >>